Chapter 2

Bandy, Joe. “Bordering the future: resisting neoliberalism in the borderlands.” Critical Sociology 26.3 (2000). Barrera Bassols, Dalia and Alejandra Massolo.
273KB Größe 51 Downloads 312 vistas
Chapter 2 Women and Border Diversity By Christine Thurlow Brenner The U.S.-Mexico border is an area where people, economies, politics and place are intertwined in highly symbiotic relationships. It is at once the same and yet highly diverse. The paradox of place and the intersection of people in a border region is the focus of this chapter. Women are particularly impacted by life in the borderlands where transnational lifestyles, learning to balance traditional gender roles and the demands of economic provision for the home, and the unexpected role of community activism in order to secure more stable homes for their families thrust them into new roles in their families and communities. The dark side of the border – sexual exploitation via transnational trafficking of children and young women and domestic abuse – reveals the challenges women face, particularly those who enter the United States without legal documentation. This chapter highlights the both the opportunities and challenges in the lives of border women as seen through the lens of geography, population, place, politics and economics. The chapter begins with a discussion of the unique geography of the region and the differences in the population in border communities where many nations, states and cities meet. The next section turns to an overview of the intertwined economy of the borderlands and the types of employment options open to women. Politics is the focus of the fourth section of the chapter. Here I look at policy issues that impact the borderlands, including housing, sexual exploitation of women, illegal drug trade, and U.S. states’ attitudes towards immigrants. The chapter concludes by emphasizing the impact of border diversity on women of the borderlands.

346

The U.S.-Mexico border winds through some of the harshest terrain in the desert southwest. It includes the high plateau of the Chihuahuan desert and large sections of the Sonoran desert. In Texas the once mighty Rio Grande, known as the Río Bravo in Mexico, forms the line of demarcation between the two nations, as shown in Figure 1. In other areas the delineation of the international line between the countries would be indiscernible without the construction of physical barriers, which were introduced to create obstacles to illegal entry of people and goods as well as to enhance border control. [Insert Figure 1 about here, located in Illustrations file] The present-day 1,900 mile border between United States and Mexico links the states of California and Baja California; Arizona and Sonora; New Mexico and Chihuahua; and, Texas, which also shares a border with Chihuahua, as well as Coahuila, Nuevo León, and Tamaulípas. With the exception of New Mexico, the U.S. states are substantially more populous than their Mexican neighbors, as shown in Table 1. [Insert Table 1 about here, located in illustrations file] The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 had a major impact on cities and municipios (Mexican sub-national governments similar to U.S. counties) along the border. Establishment of the contemporary boundary line divided many communities. In some instances Mexicans suddenly found themselves living in American cities (e.g. Nuevo Laredo and Ojinaga), which ultimately lead many Mexicans to repatriate on the southern side of the border (Coronado and Padilla 2003). Those Mexicans who chose to stay in the United States maintained strong familial and economic ties across the border in their sister city.

347

Fourteen twin or sister cities embrace the U.S.-Mexico border today, as shown in Table 2. They range in size from the San Diego-Tijuana area of 2.4 million people to the combined Nacos with a population of 6,203. One of the more interesting dynamics of place is that with the exception of sister cities of San Diego-Tijuana over two thirds or more of the sister cities’ population reside on the Mexican side of the border. [Inset Table 2 about here, in illustrations file] The poverty level in U.S. border cities significantly exceeds that of the states in which they reside, as shown in Figure 2. Yuma and San Diego stand as exceptions to the rule, as the numbers of persons living below the federal poverty level in those cities only slightly exceed that of Arizona and California. While lower standards of living characterize U.S. border communities, it is the Latino population that comprises the bulk of the population living in poverty. Conversely, the National Commission of Minimum Wages sets a higher minimum wage in Mexican border cities than in the rural areas of their states, $46.80 compared to $44.05, respectively (McBride 2005). In Mexico, it is the indigenous population that experiences higher poverty levels. [Insert Figure 2 about here, in Illustrations file] Today many nations meet in the borderlands. While we commonly refer to this area as the U.S.-Mexico border, Native American nations are often overlooked. The Tohono O’Odham Nation, the second largest Native American nation in the United States, is located in south central Arizona where 63 miles of the tribal border adjoins Mexico. Traditionally, tribal members have traveled freely between their lands in the United States and tribal holdings in Mexico. The much smaller Cocopah Nation, located adjacent to the Colorado

348

River near Yuma, Arizona, comprises 9.4 square miles primarily used for agriculture (Economic Development Research Program 2004). In Texas, the Kickapoo nation represents another transnational tribe, with the majority of the Mexican Kickapoo residing in El Nacimiento, Coahuila, 130 miles southwest of Eagle Pass, Texas. Mexico and the United States permit the Kickapoo to seek employment in both nations, which allows them to cross the international border at will (Nunley 2002). El Paso is home to the other Texas Native American tribe.

While the

Tigua Indians of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo settled in the area in 1682, it was not until May 1967 that the Tiguas were officially recognized by the state of Texas. The approximately 2,000 tribal members currently occupy 26 acres of trust land (Wright 2004). Internationals from around the world have found the porous nature of the U.S.-Mexico border an attractive venue for unauthorized entry. Federal policy decisions often have major impacts on border cities and counties, but no where more so than in the area of immigration. The push factor of the prolonged five-year drought in central Mexico led many poorly educated subsistence farmers to immigrate to Mexican border cities lured by the hope of maquiladora or other employment in the fronteriza norte. The labor pool in Mexican border cities includes Mexicans, indigenous persons, and others from Central and South America. Cuidad Juárez has become a zone of transition for Eastern Europeans desiring to slip across the border into the United States.1 Asians who are attempting to traverse the borders without papers have found Calexico, California and other places in Baja California prime locations to cross. Mexican citizens have long been an important labor source for Americans. During World War II the United States established the Bracero

349

program that permitted American farmers to hire Mexican laborers to help with the planting and harvest seasons. When the program officially ended in 1964, the need for cheap labor did not (Calavita 1992). Today “the growing polarization of the labor market has created a mounting demand for Mexican workers to fill the bottom layers in agriculture, deskilled assembly, and above all services” as well as largely unskilled construction positions (Rouse 2004, 29). Transnational circuits between predominantly rural Mexican villages and U.S. communities flow through the border zone (Rouse 2004.) Mexican women know the bittersweet lure of the northern border. Left behind as their husbands, brothers and fathers seek employment, they become, in effect, single mothers. The economic sustenance of families is highly dependent on remittances sent by both male and female family members who are employed elsewhere in Mexico or abroad. Mexican citizens living abroad sent an estimated $13 billion home annually in 2004, representing the “third largest source of foreign reserves [in Mexico] after trade and tourism” (Sifuentes 2004b, Orrenius 2001). Migradollars, or remittances, which average $235 per remittance, have been linked to lower infant mortality rates in Mexico, as the money helps provide healthcare and better nutrition for pregnant women (Kanaiaupuni and Donato 1999; Sifuentes 2004a). Women also emigrate, usually after male family members have established work, young wives and older daughters first, followed later by older wives and young girls (Cornelius 2001). In addition to family stage migration, HondagneuSotelo (1994) also notes instances of intact family unit migration and the independent migration of women, which Mattingly (2001) confirms in the case of female domestic service workers. Remote desert areas near Columbus, New Mexico, rural south Texas and Sasabe, Arizona, considered the busiest area for undocumented crossing, are

350

staging areas for transit. Major human smuggling rings developed to transport the undocumented in vans, in containers hauled by eighteen wheel semi-trucks and by train. Dehydration, hyperthermia, suffocation and often death can occur during transit to the States (Associated Press 2004c; Eschbach, Hagan and Rodriquez 2003). Cornelius suggests that “forcing a substantially larger Mexico-to-U.S. migratory flow, containing a higher proportion of economically desperate people, to detour around the concentrated border environment operations now in place (with others possibly to be added) would inevitably increase border-crossing deaths” (2001, 680). Repatriation of deceased foreign transients can run into the thousands of dollars based on the weight of the body and distance it is being shipped, placing an enormous financial burden on women and their families, who want to bring their loved ones home for burial (Hansen 2004). In the next section we will consider the economic linkages in the borderlands and employment options available to women. Economy There is a transnational influence on the lives of many people living in the borderlands. American maquiladora (twin plant) managers use their dedicated commuter lane passes to cross daily into Mexico for business. U.S. tourists enjoy the shopping in open-air mercados (markets) and dining on Mexican cuisine. U.S. residents without insurance will also seek medical and dental attention in Mexican border cities because of the reduced fees. Senior citizens and others are drawn across the border because of reduced pharmaceutical prices and the fact that many prescription drugs are available without doctor’s orders in Mexico. Mexicans cross to shop in American malls and downtown businesses that cater to border crossers. Others sojourn daily for jobs as domestics, gardeners and construction workers. Some people have

351

family living on both sides of the international boundary. Approximately four million Mexican citizens hold the new laser visas, called micas, which allow them to cross into the United States for up to 72 hours as long as they stay within 25 miles of the border.2 These biometric cards facilitate legal movement in the border while meeting the advanced security scrutiny necessary after September 11, 2001. Historically the economies of Mexico and the United States were closely intertwined in the borderlands. Internal migration patterns developed to bring a steady stream of laborers from rural central Mexico to the northern border. When the Bracero program ended in 1964, fears of massive repatriation of seasonal farm laborers to border cities led Mexico to expand industrial development under the new Border Industrialization Program, which authorized foreign-owned firms to operate duty-free along the U.S. border (GOA 2003). Simultaneously, the United States changed its tariff rules permitting partially assembled goods with American components to enter the United States for finishing. These two actions established the perfect environment for twin plants to develop. Employment in the border maquiladora industries grew rapidly from 1990 through 2000; however, the downturn in the U.S. economy had negative spillover impacts on the industries. The paradox of the maquiladora employment is that as conditions and pay increased, compared with other areas in Mexico, industry owners began to explore lower labor costs in other countries. By 2002, many Mexican border communities had lost nearly one-third of maquiladora employment as jobs moved to China, Central America and the Caribbean (GAO 2003). In terms of women’s employment, “the maquiladora industry has provided important outlets for alternative work in the formal sector to a particular

352

slice of the population: young women, whose alternative work options would have been agriculture, domestic service or small sales in the informal sector” (Peña 2000, 128). In many ways this work has increased the personal freedoms rural women who migrated to industrialized urban areas experience. Shift work, while tedious and demanding, is over when the work day is done as compared to agricultural fieldwork or the 24/7 service demands of live-in domestics (Peña 2000; Pisani and Yoskowitz 2002). Female workers initially dominated the unskilled, low-wage production jobs in the maquiladora industries. In Mexico women can legally begin working on the assembly line at age 15; however, many girls as young as 11 or 12 purchase forged documents to gain employment access at even younger ages (Staudt 1998). More recent hiring practices placed greater regard for more mature married women.3 The high training costs associated high employee turnover rates spawned exploitive employment practices targeting women. Mandatory pre-employment pregnancy testing as a condition of employment and post-employment pregnancy firings, while technically illegal under Mexican law, have been documented by non-profit organizations (Human Rights Watch 1996). Practices such as requiring an employee to show her soiled sanitary napkin as proof she is not pregnant, are degrading to women. The unfortunate disregard for constitutional and legal protection for women by the maquiladora industries and the blind-eye shown by the Mexican government has placed women at the mercy of pregnancy-based sex discrimination (Staudt and Coronado 2002; Human Rights Watch 1996; U.S. National Administrative Office 1998). Some women, angered by oppressive labor practices in the maquiladoras, are empowered to take action. One example is Martha Ojeda, executive director of the Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras (CJM). She was nominated as

353

union president at Sony’s Nuevo Laredo plant in 1992 and all her union supporters were immediately fired. Officials in Mexico City, unwilling to accept the actual results, declared her opponent the winner. Workers, furious with the results, blockaded the plant. Three days later the women were beaten and dispersed by plant guards and local police. Ojeda became the first Mexican to head the CJM, the organization that brought the first labor dispute filed under NAFTA’s labor accord. (Bacon 2000).4 Border employment is also difficult for well-educated women. Chronic under-employment and unemployment means women often cannot work in their field, or they are paid less than their skills are worth. Young collegeeducated border women find themselves looking beyond the border region for the best career options, resulting in a pink brain drain. Interestingly, as these young career women marry and begin raising their own children, the lure of family ties often draws them back to the border region. Domestic employment provides workforce opportunities for women willing to embrace a transnational lifestyle. The economic pull of good wages, relative to Mexico, and the push of limited, low-wage employment options for women in Mexican border cities work together to make U.S. domestic service, as either a day or live-in maid, a viable workforce choice (Mattingly 2001; Pisani and Yoskowitz 2002). In addition, American employers often have little regard for the immigration status of their maids; however, there is a wage penalty for domestic workers who lack legal documentation to be in the United States. Clean houses, folded laundry, and loving childcare trump micas or green cards in many instances. Pisani and Yoskowitz (2002) find that day maids command higher wages ($3.44 per day) and better working hours and conditions than live-in maids, whose daily wage rate averages $2.61. Staudt and Coronado (2002) also find positive spillover effects for maids, which may

354

include access to financial loans from their employers, food, clothes and in some cases money to help educate their children. Mattingly (2001, 384) also notes that “the reliance of relatively affluent [U.S.] households on paid caring labor is made possible by the presence of immigrant women and encourages their continued migration.” On the American side of the border, beginning in the late 1980s seamstresses working in Levi Strauss and Company and other garment industries lost their jobs, when the apparel manufacturers moved south of the border in search of cheap labor. The displaced workers were primarily female, frequently single heads of households who often had less than a ninth grade education supporting three to four children (Brenner 2002). La Mujer Obrera (The Woman Worker) in El Paso was one group that organized to advocate for the re-training and welfare needs of the displaced workers. Known in the early 1980s for using Saul Alinsky-style grassroots community organizing and advocacy, its non-profit offshoot, El Puente (The Bridge) which was founded in 1997, operates a restaurant, mercado and daycare center, which employ displaced workers, as well as offering workforce training in their community technology center and low income housing. Women along the border often engage in the informal economy, trading services with each other for child care or transportation and selling crafts or food that they produce at home. Items may be sold from their home or at local placitas or flea markets. Some import items from Mexico, like candy or pharmaceuticals, which are offered for resale in the States (Godines and McKim 2004). This has been problematic not only for health concerns about lead-laced sweets but also the illegality of dispensing medicine without license (McKim and Sharon 2004). Although they often feel they do not participate in the job market because they do not receive a paycheck, their

355

contributions to total household income are important for low income families (Brenner and Coronado 2004; Staudt 1998). Women have always been workers contributing to the economic viability of their households. Whether they function in the formal labor market or the informal economy or simply barter services with others, the nurturing role of women influences their economic roles. Women also serve as the primary consumers for their households as they seek to clothe, feed and educate themselves and their families. There is a dynamic tension in the daily lives of women. Employment, the support of other women, and a strong survival drive to provide for loved ones propels women into an empowered social position. Meanwhile, oppressive labor practices, employment opportunities that are reduced by either by women’s lack of educational attainment or the availability of positions that allow them to use their educational skills, and the constraints of traditional patriarchal household arrangements conspire to keep women in subservient positions. The following section considers the impact of the border political environment on the lives of women. Politics Identifying issues as strictly border concerns can be a double-edged sword. Certainly there are many concerns unique to a border community; however, such characterization can be an obstacle to legislators who are trying to muster enough votes for border-specific legislation. U.S. border cities such as El Paso, Brownsville and Laredo are often confronted with issues that are actually urban concerns, and that could be used as bases for coalition building with places like Dallas and Houston, although that political tactic is not always explored. Similarly, Mexican border cities have experienced marginalization due to their distance from Mexico City, yet

356

that very remoteness created opportunities for opposition political parties to capture mayoral elections. This section, rather than exploring formal electoral and political patterns, focuses on the political environment that contributes to women’s oppression and empowerment. Through the discussion of women’s activism in housing and industrial employment we see the empowerment of women in their every day lives. The darker side of oppression is revealed through exploration of the sexual exploitation border women must confront. Housing and Women’s Activism Housing is an arena where women are politically active. Throughout the region colonias developed to meet the need of affordable housing for low income persons. Housing is often constructed of found materials on inexpensive land of little value, usually on the outskirts of a city that is either purchased through contract deed or simply settled by people needing a place to live. In Mexico, colonias populares, or slums, developed in urban border areas, as well as adjacent to major urban areas in the interior of the country. These are “‘self-help’ settlements where families build their own houses on land that is acquired illegally, but subsequently regularized through government legalization programmes providing title for the occupants” (Varley and Blasco 2000, 1). It is the women of the community who provide the informal leadership for most colonias. Because their lives reflect traditional gender roles with the male as primary provider and woman as keeper of the home and hearth, women have the time to organize (Dolhinow this volume, Ward 2004). They often lead grassroots efforts to bring water and other basic needs to the colonias in an effort to improve their families’ lives.

357

As in the colonias north of the border, women play key roles in negotiating daily life in the Mexican colonias populares. Guttman (1999) finds that “the significant relationship between popular political culture [in Mexico] and the emergence of grassroots feminism in social movements and daily life in colonias populares…provides the historical context in which…women in the neighborhood have increasingly played the role of catalysts in the transformation of popular political culture generally.” Furthermore, it is often the woman of the household who saves from her household money or constantly urges her husband to purchase property and obtain the highly-prized title deed (Varley and Blasco 2000).5 Women may be more vulnerable to losing their homes in Mexico than in the United States, as decisions about whose name the title deed is registered in can create ownership issues if a married woman is widowed or divorced. Mexican civil law varies among the states, as in the United States; however, the Mexican court’s tradition is one of favoring the man in issues of land ownership (Varley and Blasco 2000). In the United States, the courts lean in the opposite direction, often deciding in favor of a woman, especially if she has children. Sexual Exploitation of Women For many women the border region becomes an unhealthy environment in which the sexual exploitation thrives. Migrant families without strong local familial ties have reduced resources for coping with marital and financial stress. Domestic violence is prevalent both north and south of the international boundary (Salinas 2004). Traditional patriarchal social mores, financial dependence on men and women’s fears of speaking out because of their residency status often conspire to keep women in oppressive situations (National Latino Alliance for the Elimination of Domestic Violence 2001).

358

Young women living in the border region are often invisible and by extension disposable. In Cuidad Juárez, over 300 young women have been viciously murdered in the past eleven years, crimes that tragically remain unsolved (NPR 2003). Most were maquiladora workers who migrated to Mexico’s northern border to escape the poverty of their rural villages. Street light poles throughout Cuidad Juárez are painted with pink rectangles that outline a black cross as a somber reminder of the disappeared. The cry of ¡Ni una más! (Not one more!) focused international attention on this border community, as organizations as diverse as Amnesty International and grassroots associations of family members, especially mothers, who have lost loved ones, have combined forces to seek answers for these heartbreaking crimes. One theory, advanced by an experienced bi-national journalist Diana Washington Valdez, is that the young sons of the Juárez drug cartel are behind the crimes, using the women for their pleasure and then disposing of them in the Chihuahuan desert (Valdez 2004).6 Sex trafficking of women and young girls, seen throughout the borderlands and extending into the interior of the United States, is a definite problem (McDonald 2004; U.S. Dept. of Justice 2004; U.S. Dept. of State 2004). Often lured into the United States with the promise of domestic work, women are forced to work in brothels fearing reprisals on the family members they left behind. “We’re talking severe trauma…having the mind-set of being a slave in fear of their life. Being threatened and threatening the lives of their families. They are slaves and that mentality is a common occurrence” (Sifuentes 2004a). A culture of corruption on both sides of the border emboldens those who seek to abuse and oppress women. The undocumented status of many women in the United States leaves them vulnerable to exploitation. In Mexico, the recent

359

rise of sex tourism is facilitated by Internet-based promotions of erotic vacations; however, some communities like Tijuana were havens for vice since the 1920s (Lopez-Estrada 1998; Shirk and Webber 2004). Commercial sexual exploitation includes pedophilia, abuse that touches the lives of approximately 16,000 children and the sale of infants and young children. The border proximity and the juxtaposition of women living in poverty with the relative wealth of the sex tourists continue to feed this darker side of the border life; however, Lopez-Estrada (1998) does note that some sex workers are organizing both to protect themselves and their urban space. Illegal Drug Trade Another major challenge facing Mexico and United States is the highly lucrative drug trade. Narco-violence can take the form of kidnapping and murder on both sides of the border. Forced home invasions in south Texas, extortion of protection money, rival gang killings in Cuidad Juárez, money laundering and a maze of border tunnels are all evidence of the drug cartels’ presence (Cearley 2004; Getty 2004). Scandals involving Mexican police, at the local, state and federal level, where almost 500 officers have been fired or suspended, as well as corruption in the U.S. Customs Service and Immigration and Naturalization Service, who open an average of 53 new cases a year against agents, create a climate that makes winning the war on drugs difficult, if not impossible (Burnett 2002; Corchado and Sandoval 2004). Women’s activism through groups such as the International Association of Relatives and Friends of Disappeared Persons (El Paso-Cuidad Juárez) and Esperanza Association (Baja California) presses their belief that the fathers, husbands and brothers who have vanished are victims of narcoviolence. Their protests and appeals to the international humanitarian

360

community are designed to bring pressure on the Mexican government to solve the crimes of the disappeared. U.S. State Attitudes towards Immigrants and the Impact on Women American attitudes and state-level policy initiatives have varied across the four border states. California and Arizona have pursued policies that are oppressive and restrictive in nature while Texas and New Mexico have tried to find ways to empower Latinos, regardless of their residency status. The 1994 passage of California’s Proposition 187 denied healthcare, welfare and some education benefits to undocumented immigrants. Nativism and the rhetoric of xenophobia characterized the majority attitudes of the state at the time, even though the courts eventually found most of the provisions unconstitutional (Ono and Sloop 2002). Chang (2000, 11) suggests that such legislation effectively “capture[s] the labor of immigrant men and women separate from their human needs or those of their dependents.” However, Mattingly (2004, 144) notes that “the kind of labor ‘captured’ from men and women is different; immigrant women are often employed providing caring labor (childcare, elder care, housekeeping) for citizen families.” The pursuit of this kind of female labor extracts an additional cost as well, that of providing childcare for immigrants’ own children, a cost that previous to Proposition 187 might be deferred for women living in poverty through social welfare benefits. California has also pursued an English-only policy with regards to the elementary and secondary education of immigrant children, making native language maintenance more difficult for women who want to raise bilingual children. Arizona has also taken a more negative view of immigration focusing on the costs incurred by border counties (Salant et al. 2001). Vigilantism aimed at undocumented foreign migrants is prevalent on ranchlands along the

361

Arizona’s Sonora desert border as the migrant flow is channeled into remote areas in response to heightened enforcement in urban areas (Garcia 2000; Gonzales 2003). While a number of non-profit and faith-based organizations are working to change prevailing attitudes, anti-immigrant sentiment is strong in both states. Texans recognized the importance of the co-joined border economies. The invitation of the governors of all four neighboring Mexican states to attend former governor Bush’s inauguration in 1994 was a symbolic recognition of their mutual concern for the borderlands. The research of state demographer Steve Murdoch of Texas A & M University was highly influential among legislators and other administrators crafting the state’s policies towards Latinos. Mirroring the perspective of most longtime Latino residents, Murdoch helped Texans understand that their certain future as a poorer, less educated state could only be avoided by addressing the educational, health, workforce development and other needs of the Latino community (Murdoch et al. 1997). A case study of El Paso, Texas underscores the lack of attention to Latinos’ educational attainment as a primary factor in the decreasing economic vitality of the region from 1950 to 2000 (Brenner 2001). Under current governor Rick Perry, Texas legislation was passed that allows undocumented U.S. high school graduates to enter Texas institutions of higher education. California’s policy appears to be changing with the passage of similar legislation three years. New Mexico has traditionally been seen as the most accommodating in its relationship with Mexico. In the northern portion of the state, U.S. citizens of Mexican descent can trace their roots back hundreds of years, as many in California do also. In southern New Mexico, most of the Mexicans living in the state are recent immigrants working in New Mexico’s farming industry. New

362

Mexico is the only state in United States to have a Hispanic governor, democrat Bill Richardson and was also the first state to recognize matricula consulares issued by the Mexican government as an official form of identification for Mexican citizens living abroad. This document can be used to open bank accounts or obtain a drivers’ license in New Mexico as well as in neighboring Texas. Today intergovernmental agreements between the communities reflect the supportive nature of the sister cities’ relationship. For example, Columbus, New Mexico provides emergency fire service to Las Palomas, and in Texas, the El Paso Fire Department and private ambulances responded to 1,322 medical calls at international ports-of-entry in 2003, often accepting transfers from UMAM, a private ambulance transport from Cuidad Juárez (Gilot 2004). On a broader border-wide basis, trans-boundary management of environmental resources, such as air and water, are critical to the growth and survival of the sister cities. Places are also joined through the formation of binational organizations like the Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy, and the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission, which focus on specific policy issues impacting both sides of the international border. Conclusion The geography of the border impacts the lives and relationships of people living along the international boundary. In areas where terrain and bridges combine to give easy access for transnational residents, whose lives flow freely back and forth for business and pleasure, they maintain a strong sense of the connectedness with people and place. In the more forbidding remote deserts and mountainous areas, geography flaunts the lines humans try to impose where nations meet.

363

The diversity of the U.S.-Mexico borderlands is what gives it the richness and texture that is so compelling to those who call it home. The interplay of people, place, politics, and economics has created a milieu that is viewed as a unique fronteriza by both national governments. This challenges border residents to help interpret their life experiences to policy makers in Mexico City and Washington D.C. as well as Sacramento, Phoenix, Santa Fe, Austin, Chihuahua City, Mexicali, Saltillo, Cuidad Victoria and Monterrey. Life in the borderlands is hard for women. Acceptance of traditional gender roles limits choices, while pursuit of higher education opens the door for a different future. The high cultural value placed on the family strengthens the importance of women’s roles but can be constricting as well. The prevalence of violence against and exploitation of women is troubling. Lower divorce rates speak to the integrity of family, but can mask a darker side of life fraught with domestic violence for women. The low wage structure of most border communities leaves few options for women. Educational attainment offers the best promise for women who want to craft a better future for their families. The new generation of collegeeducated Latinas will be change agents working alongside those women of humble means and limited education who are striving daily for a better life in their community by challenging existing political structures to gain water, sewer and electricity for their homes. The power to harness the diversity of the border is nurtured in the homes and families these women represent. Furthermore, it is women who assume the primary role in transmitting culture to subsequent generations. Border places, long marginalized by U.S. and Mexican national and state politics, are co-joined economic entities. People, raised with a bi-national, bi-

364

cultural consciousness of the paradoxes, are best positioned to interpret and cultivate the future of the borderlands.

Notes. Chapter 2: Women and Border Diversity, By Christine Thurlow Brenner 1. Dr. Tony Kruschevsky, political science professor at the University of Texas at El Paso, describes seeing a travel poster for Cuidad Juárez while traveling in Poland. His wife, June, often acted as translator for the U.S. Border Patrol when Russians and Poles were apprehended for illegal entry into the United States. 2. The exception to the 25 mile crossing limit is in Arizona, where border crossing card holders can travel to Tucson, which is 65 miles from the international border. 3. Susan Tiano’s chapter explores in greater depth the changing gender composition of the maquila workforce and subsequent marginalization of women. 4. Ana Bergareche’s chapter provides a more extensive discussion of the role of gender solidarity, activism and autonomous self-development among female maquiladora employees. 5. Rebecca Dolhinow’s chapter explores in greater depth Mexican women’s activism in colonias along the U.S.–Mexico border. 6. The police suspect at least 100 of the deaths are the work of serial killers. Locally, the Coalition on Violence Against Women and Their Families on the Border, an El Paso-based group of family members, academic activists like Drs. Emma Perez, Irasema Coronado, and Kathleen Staudt, and communitybased

organizations

work

to

keep

the

issue

in

the

press

and

to

bring

political pressure on politicians. Texas Governor Rick Perry’s wife, herself a nurse, met with the group and is an advocate for resolution of the crimes.

365

In Los Angeles, Viejaskandalosas, an association of artists, writers, and others which developed an advocacy network in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California, is representative of women’s groups in other places that are concerned about the deaths and disappearance of young girls in Cuidad Juárez.

Bibliography Abramovitz, M. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Boston, MA: South End Press, 1998. Acevedo, L. “Feminist Inroads in the Study of Women’s Work and Development.” Acosta-Belén, Edna and Bose, Christine E. Women in the Latin American Development Process. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995. Ackelson, Jason. “Directions in border security research.” The Social Science Journal. 40.4 (2003): 573-581. Aitken, Stuart. Family Fantasies and Community Space. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998. Alvarez, Sonia. “Los Feminismos Latinoamericanos de Globalizan en los Noventa: Retos Para un Nuevo Milenio.” In Género y Cultura en America Latina. Ed. Ma. Luisa Tarrés. México: El Colegio de México, 1998. Amin, Samir. Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formations of Peripheral Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976. Anderson, B. “Overseas domestic workers in the European Union.” In Gender, Migration, and Domestic Service. Ed. J. Momson. New York: Routledge, 1999: 117-133. Andreas, Peter. “A tale of two borders: the U.S-Canada and U.S.-Mexico lines after 9-11.” In The Rebordering of North America: Integration and Exclusion in a New Security Context. Eds. Peter Andreas and Thomas J. Biersteker. New York: Routledge, 2003: 1-23.

366

Andreas Peter. Border Games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico Divide. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000. Andreas, Peter and Snyder, Timothy, Eds. The Wall Around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000. Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Ante Lute Books, 1987. Aptheker, B. Tapestries of Life. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1989. Araya, María José. Un Acercamiento a las Encuestas Sobre el uso del Tiempo con Orientación de Género. United Nations, Division of Social Development, CEPAL. Women and Development Series, Number 50. Santiago de Chile: United Nations, 2003. Arizona-Mexico Commission. Border Issues. 2004. Retrieved from . Arizpe, Lourdes. “Las indígenas en la Ciudad de México: el caso de las Marías.” Sep-Setenta. México, 1975. Arreola, Daniel D. and Curtis, James R. The Mexican Border Cities: Landscape Anatomy and Place Personality. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1993. Associated Press. “Border Inspector Charged with Smuggling Immigrants for Sex.” March 31, 2004. Retrieved from . Associated Press. “Last Suspect in Deadly Smuggling Ring Arrested.” April 29, 2004. Retrieved from .

367

Associated Press. “Texans want equity for Mexican, Canadian visitors.” Tucson Citizen, Friday, November 7, 2003. Retrieved from . Associated Press. “Trial to Begin in Alleged border Baby-Selling Ring.” April 13, 2004. Retrieved from . Avendaño, Rosa María, et.al. “Las ONG en la Frontera Baja CaliforniaCalifornia: Un acercamiento al estudio de la Diplomacia Ciudadana.” Estudios Fronterizos 1.1 (2000): 89-135. Axtman, Chris. “274 Murders in Nine Years.” Christian Science Monitor. May 02, 2002. Bacon, David. “Profile — U.S.: Martha Ojeda — Raising Hell on the Border.” Inter Press Service, March 31, 2000. Baden, Sally. “Recession and structural adjustment’s impact on women’s work in selected developing countries.” In Promoting Gender Equality at Work: Turning Vision into Reality. Ed. Eugenia Date-Bah. London: Zed/International Labour Organisation, 1997. Bakan, A. and Stasiulis, D. “Foreign Domestic Worker Policy in Canada and the Social Boundaries of Modern Citizenship.” Science and Society 58.1 (1994): 7-33. Bakker, I. “Introduction: Engendering Macro-Economic Policy Reform in the Era of Global Restructuring and Adjustment.” In The Strategic Silence. Ed. I. Bakker. London: Zed, 1994. Bakshi, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., and Southern, A. “Gender, Race, and Class in the Local Welfare State: Moving Beyond Regulation Theory in Analysing the Transition from Fordism.” Environment and Planning A 27 (1995): 15391554.

368

Ball, Donald W. “An abortion clinic ethnography.” Social Problems Winter (1967): 293-301. Bamet, Richard and Ronald Muller. Global Reach: The Power of the Multinational Corporations. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1974. Bandy, Joe. “Bordering the future: resisting neoliberalism in the borderlands.” Critical Sociology 26.3 (2000). Barrera Bassols, Dalia and Alejandra Massolo. Mujeres que gobiernan municipios: experiencias, aportes y retos. México City: Colegio de México Programa Interdisciplinario de Estudios de la Mujer, 1998. Barrientos, Stephanie, Anna Bee, Ann Matear, and Isabel Vogel. Women and Agribusiness: Working Miracles in the Chilean Fruit Export Sector. London: Macmillan, 1999. Barry, Tom, Harry Browne and Beth Sims. Crossing the Line. Immigrants, Economic Integration, and Drug Enforcement on the U.S. Mexico Border. Alburquerque Nuevo Mexico, Resource Center Press, 1994. Bayón, C. and Rojas, G. “Mujer, Familias y Trabajo en la Frontera MéxicoEstados Unidos.” Ed. P.M. Ward. Reducing Vulnerability Among Families in the México and U.S. Border Region. México D.F.: University of Texas System and Desarrollo Integral de la Familia (DIF) Nacional, 1999. Bean, F.D., Espenshade, T.E, White, M.J., and Dymowksi, R. “Post-IRCA Changes in the Composition of Undocumented Migration to the United States: An Assessment Based on Apprehensions Data.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Ed. F.D. Bean, B. Edmonston, and J.S. Passel. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press, 1990: 111-58. Bean, Frank D., Roland Chanove, Robert G. Cushing, Rodolfo de la Garza, Gary P. Freeman, Charles W. Haynes, and David Spener. Illegal Mexican

369

Migration and the United States/Mexico Border: The Effects of Operation Hold the Line on El Paso/Juárez. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, 1994. Beck, U. What is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity, 2000. Beechey, Veronica. “Women and production: A critical analysis of some sociological theories of women’s work.” In Feminism and Materialism. Eds. Annette Kuhn and Ann Marie Wolpe. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978: 155-197. Beltrán, Raymond R. “For Undocumented Students, Good Grades Don’t Put College within Reach.” La Prensa San Diego, April 27, 2004. Beneria, Lourdes. “The Mexican debt crisis: Restructuring the economy and the household.” In Unequal Burden: Economic Crises, Persistent Poverty, and Women’s Work. Eds. Lourdes Beneria and Shelly Feldman. Boulder: Westview, 1992: 83-104. Beneria, Lourdes and Gita Sen. “Accumulation, Reproduction, and Women’s Role in Economic Development: Boserup Revisited.” Signs 7.2 (1981): 279-98. Bennett, Milton J. “Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity.” In Education for the Intercultural Experience. Ed. R. Michael Paige. Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press, 1993. Bennett, Vivienne. The Politics of Water: Urban Protest, Gender and Power in Monterrey, México. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995. Bergareche, A. “Interpreting Autonomy: Work, Sexual Violence and Women’s Empowerment in the Northern Mexican Border.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, London, 2001.

370

Bernard, Anne K. et al. IDRC Networks: An Ethnographic Perspective. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, Evaluation Unit, 1996. Besserer, Federico. “Sentimientos (in)apropiados de las mujeres migrantes: Hacia una nueva ciudadanía.” 1999. Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1994. Blumberg, R. “Gender, Microenterprise, Performance, and Power. Case Studies from the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Swaziland.” In Bose, C.E. and Acosta-Belén, E., Women in the Latin American development process. Philadelphia : Temple University Press, 1995. Bondi, Liz. “Gender and geography: Crossing boundaries.” Progress in Human Geography. 17 (1993): 241-246. “Border Agents Link Bush Plan to Bigger Influx.” Star Telegram. May 16, 2004. Border Governors’ Conference. “U.S.-Mexico border states: September 11 border impact report.” Austin, TX: Texas Department of Ariculture, 2002. Retrieved from . Braverman, Harry. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974. Brenner, Christine Thurlow. Education and Income in El Paso: A Longitudinal Perspective. El Paso: Institute for Policy and Economic Development, University of Texas at El Paso, 2001. Brenner, Christine Thurlow and Irasema Coronado. “Mujer y Trabajo: La Participación de la Fuerza de Trabajo Feminina en la Frontera.” In Sociedad y Politica en la Frontera. Eds. I. Coronado and H. Padilla. Chihuahua México: Universidad Autonoma de Cuidad: Cuidad Juárez, forthcoming 2004. Brenner, Christine Thurlow, Elizabeth Dalton and Dennis Soden. Balance of Payments in El Paso: Fiscal Federalism from 1995 to 2000. El Paso:

371

Institute for Policy and Economic Analysis, University of Texas at El Paso, 2001. Brenner, Christine Thurlow, Joel Goldstein, Wilbur Thompson, and Sherman Wyman. Providing Assistance in the Formulation of Informed Investments in Trade Impacted Communities. Arlington: Center for Economic Development Research and Service, University of Texas at Arlington, 1999. Brenner, Christine Thurlow. “Developing Labor Force Preparedness as a Response to Major Job Loss: Government, Business and Education as Partners.” International Journal of Economic Development 4.1 (2002): 88-110. Brodie, J. “Shifting Boundaries: Gender and the Politics of Restructuring.” In The Strategic Silence. Ed. I. Bakker. London: Zed, 1994. Burnett, John. “Corruption at the Gates.” National Public Radio. September 12-13, 2002. Retrieved from . Jorge Bustamante, Danial Delaunay y Jorge Santibáñez, eds. Taller de Medición de la migración internacional. México: COLEF and ORSTOM, 1997. Bustos, Sergio. “Scanners added at borders: Devices won’t screen everyone.” Arizona Republic, April 19, 2004. Retrieved from . Butler, J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1999. Bysttdzienski, Jill M. Women Transforming Politics. Worldwide Strategies for Empowerment. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992. Calavita, Kitty. Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration and the INS. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1992.

372

Camp, Rod. Politics in México: The Democratic Transition, 4th Edition. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press, 2002. Campbell, H. “The U.S. Census 2000 and ‘Colonias’ Along the U.S.-México Border: An Anthropological Approach.” In Dígame: Policy and Politics on the Texas Border. Eds. C. Brenner, I. Coronado, and D. Soden. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt, 2003. Caraway, Pilfer and Slue Oozier. “Feminization of the labor force: The effects of long-term development and structural adjustment.” World Development. 23.11 (1995): 883-94. Carrillo, Jorge, Michael Mortimore and Jorge Alonso. ”Competividad, Capacitación y Movilidad Laboral en Empresas de Auto-partes y de Televisores en el Norte de México.” (mimeograph) Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 1995. Carrillo, Jorge and Alfredo Hualde. “Third generation maquiladoras: The Delphi-General Motors case.” Journal of Borderlands Studies. 13.1 (1998): 79-97. Castells, M. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 1996. Castillo, Debra A. “Border lives: prostitute women in Tijuana.” Signs. 24.2 (1999): 387-422. Castillo, Debra A. and María Socorro Tabuenca Cordoba. Border Women: Writing from La Frontera. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002. Cearley, Anna. “Suspected Border Tunnel Detected in Calexico.” San Diego Union Tribune, April 13, 2004. Ceballos, Manuel, Ed. Encuentro en la frontera: Mexicanos y Norteamericanos en un espacio común. México: El Colegio de México, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte y Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, 2001.

373

Chaney, Elsa. Supermadre: Women in Politics in Latin America. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1979. Chang, Grace. Disposable Domestics: Immigrant Women Workers in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2000. Chant, S. Women and Survival in Mexican Cities: Perspectives on Gender, Labor Markets, and Low Income Households. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991. Chirot, Daniel. Social Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977. Christensen, Kathleen. “Eliminating the journey to work: Home-based work across the life course of women in the United States.” In Full Circles: Geographies of Women Over the Life Course. Eds. Cindi Katz and Janice Monk. New York: Routledge, 1993: 55-87. Clear Channel Communications. “Woman Testifies in Baby Selling Case.” 2004. Retrieved from . Clifford, James. “Introduction: Partial Truths.” In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Eds. James Clifford and George Marcus. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986: 1-26. Cockroft, James. México: Class Formation, Capital Accumulation, and the State. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1983. Cohen, P.N. “Replacing Housework in the Service Economy: Gender, Class, and Race-Ethnicity in Service Spending.” Gender and Society. 12.2 (1998): 219-231. Colen, S. “‘Like a Mother to Them’: Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Eds. F.D. Ginsburg

374

and R. Rapp. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995. ______. “‘Housekeeping’ for the Green Card: West Indian Household Workers, the State, and Stratified Reproduction in New York.” In At Work in Homes: Household Workers in World Perspective. Eds. R. Sanjek and S. Colen. Washington DC: American Anthropological Association, 1990: 89118. Collins, Patricia Hill. “Producing the mothers of the nation: Race, class, and contemporary U.S. population policies.” In Women, Citizenship, and Difference. Eds. Nira Yuval-Davis and Pnina Werbner. London: Zed Books, 1999: 118-29. “Comercio e industria registran año negativo localmente.” Diario de Juárez. Juárez, Chihuahua, December 31, 2003. Cornelius, Wayne A. “Death at the Border: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of U.S. Immigration Control Policy.” Population and Development Review. 27.4 (2001): 661-685. Cornelius, W.A. “From Sojourners to Settlers: The Changing Profile of Mexican Migration to the United States.” In U.S.-Mexico Relations: Labor Market Interdependence. Eds. J.A. Bustamante, C.W. Reynolds, and R.A. Hinojosa Ojeda. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992: 155-195. Corona Guerrero, Pedro. “Repercusiones inmediatas del TLCAN en la industria manufacturera de México y su impacto en la fuerza de trabajo femenina.” In Globalización en México y Desafíos del Empleo Femenino. Ed. María Luisa González Marín. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2000: 107-134.

375

Coronado, Irasema. “Who Governs in a Binational Context? The Role of Transnational Political Elites.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, 1998. Coronado, Irasema and Padilla, Héctor. “Cross-Border Cooperation: The case of Ciudad Juárez-El Paso.” In Dígame! Public Policy on the Texas Border. Eds. Christine Brenner, Irasema Coronado, and Dennis Soden. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt, 2003. Coronado, Irasema and Kamala Platt. “The Cultural Poetics of Environmental Justice,” Guadalupe Cultural Arts Center, San Antonio, Texas, forthcoming 2004. Coronado Moreno, Martin “Comercio e industria registran año negativo localmente.” Diario de Juárez. Juárez, Chihuahua, December 31, 2003. Cortes, Ernesto. Reweaving the fabric: the iron rule and the IAF strategy for dealing with poverty through power and politics. Piscataway, New Jersey: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers, The State University, 1993. Cortez, Richard. Open letter to Honorable Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homeland Security. Phoenix, AZ: Border Trade Alliance, 2003. Retrieved from . Craig, R. B. The Bracero Program: Interest Groups and Foreign Policy. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1971. Cravey, Altha. “The politics of reproduction: Households in the Mexican industrial transition.” Economic Geography. 73.2 (1997): 166-86. Cravey, Altha J. Women and Work in México’s Maquiladoras. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998. D’Abeterre, Buznego and María Eugenia. “El pogo de la nova: Matrimonio, vida conyugal y practices transnacionales en San Miguel Acuexcomal, Puebla.”

376

Zamora, Michoacan: El Colegio de Michoacan; Puebla, Puebla: Instituto de ciencias Sociales y Humanas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, 2000. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Webpage. . Denman, Catalina, Janice Monk, and Norma Ojeda de la Peña. Compartiendo historias de fronteras: Cuerpos, géneros, generaciones, y salud. Hermosillo: El Colegio de Sonora, forthcoming 2004. Diario de Juarez. September 26, 1993: 5A. Dietz, Mary G. “El contexto es lo que cuenta: Feminismo y teorias de la ciudadanía.” Debate feminista. 1 (1990): 114-142. Dill, B.T. “Making Your Job Good Yourself: Domestic Service and the Construction of Personal Dignity.” In Women and the Politics of Empowerment. Eds. A. Bookman and S. Morgen. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988: 33-52. Diochea, Perlita R. “Local Leaders Meet to Stop the Final Three Miles of Triple Border Fence.” La Prensa San Diego, Feb. 6, 2004. Dolhinow, R. Borderlands Justice: Women’s Community Activism in the Colonias of Doña Ana County, New México. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2003. Dolhinow, R. submitted. “The Ambiguous Activist: Global Economic Restructuring, Neoliberalism, and NGOs in U.S.-México Border Communities.” Antipode special edition: Working the Spaces of Neoliberalism: activism, professionalisation and incorporation. Eds. L. Bondi and N. Laurie. Donato Katharine M. “The Cat and Mouse Game at the Mexico-U.S. Border: New Patterns And Recent Shifts.” Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Atlanta, November 2002.

377

Domash, M. and J. Seager. Putting Women in Place: Feminist Geographers Make Sense of the World. New York: Guilford, 2001. Duarte, P. and González, G. La Lucha contra la Violencia de Género en México: de Nairobi a Beijing, 1985-1995. Covac, México, 1994. Dunn, Timothy J. The Militarization of the U.S.-Mexico Border 1978-1992: LowIntensity Doctrine Comes Home. The Center for Mexican American Studies. Austin, Tex: CMAS Books, 1996. Dyck, Isabel, Judith M. Lynam, and Joan M. Anderson. “Women talking: creating knowledge through difference in cross-cultural research.” Women’s Studies International Forum. 18.5/6 (1995): 611-26. Dyck, I. “Mother or Worker? Women’s Support Networks, Local Knowledge, and Informal Child Care Strategies.” In Who Will Mind the Baby? Ed. K. England. London: Routledge, 1996: 123-142. Easterby-Smith, Mark, and Danusia Malina. “Cross-cultural collaborative research: toward reflexivity.” Academy of Management Journal 42.1 (1999): 76-86. Economic Development Research Program. Arizona Native American Tribes. 2004. Retrieved from . El Paso Collaborative for Academic Excellence n.d. Overview. Retrieved from . Elson, Diane. “From Survival Strategies to Transformation Strategies: Women’s Needs and Structural Adjustment.” In Unequal Burden: Economic Crises, Persistent Poverty, and Women’s Work. Eds. Lourdes Benería and Shelly Feldman. Boulder: Westview, 1992: 26-48. Encinas, A. and Anaya, E. “Frontera Norte.” Frontera Norte. México D.F.: Territorios, 1994.

378

England, Kim V.L. “Changing suburbs, changing women: Geographic perspectives on suburban women and suburbanization.” Frontiers. 14.1 (1993): 24-43. England, P. and Folbre, N. “The Cost of Caring.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 561 (1999): 39-51. Eschbach, Karl, Jacqueline Hagan and Nestor Rodriquez. “Deaths During Undocumented Migration: Trends and Policy Implications in the New Era of Homeland Security.” Paper presented at the 26th Annual National Legal Conference on Immigration and Refugee Policy, Washington D.C., 2003. Esbach, Karl, Jacqueline Hagan, Nestor Rodriquez, and Stanley Ruben Bailey. “Death at the Border.” International Migration Review. 33.2 (1999):430454. Espinosa, Gisela. “Rezagos y los retos para el feminismo y los movimientos de mujeres.” In Feminismo en Mϑxico. Revisión histórico crítica del siglo que termina. Ed. Griselda Gutiérrez Castañeda. México: Colección Libros del PUEG, UNAM, 2002a. Espinosa, Gisela. “Ciudadanía y Feminismo Popular.” In Democracia y Luchas de Género: La construcción de un nuevo campo teórico y político. Ed. Griselda Gutiérrez Castañeda. México: Colección Libros del PUEG, UNAM, 2002b. Falcón, Sylvanna. “Rape as a weapon of war: advancing human rights for women at the U.S.-Mexico border.” Social Justice. 28.2 (2001): 31-50. Fanon, Franz. “Los condenados de la tierra.” Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1965. Fay, Brian. Critical Social Science: Liberation and its Limits. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.

379

Federici, Silvia. “Reproduction and Feminist Struggle in the New International Division of Labor.” In Women, Development and Labor of Reproduction: Struggles and Movements. Eds. Mariarosa Dalla Costa and Giovanna Dalla Costa. Asmara, Eritrea: Africa World Press, 1999. Fernández, Raul. The United States-México Border. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1977. Fernández-Kelly, María Patricia. “Broadening the Scope: Gender and the Study of International Development.” In Comparative National Development: Society and Economy in the New Global Order. Eds. Douglas Kincaid and Alejandro Portes. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994: 143-168. Fernández-Kelly, María Patricia. For We Are Sold I and My People: Women and Industry in México’s Frontier. New York: University of New York Press, 1983. Fernández-Kelly, María Patricia. “Mexican Border Industrializaton, Female Labor Force Participacion and Migration”. In Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor. Albany, New York: The State University of New York Press, 1983. Fernández Poncela, Ana. Participación política. Las Mujeres en México al final del milenio. México: PIEM, El Colegio de México, 1995. Fisher, Jo. Mothers of the Disappeared. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1989. Flora, Maria Sagrario. “Work intensity and time use: What do women do when there aren’t enough hours in a day?” In Color, Class and Country: Experiences of Gender. Eds. Gay Young and Bette J. Dickerson. London: Zed Books, 1994: 168-81. Fontana, Marzia, Susan Joekes, and Rachel Masika. Global Trade Expansion and Liberalization: Gender Issues and Impacts. Report no. 42. Department

380

for International Development (DFID). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, 1998. Forrest, R. “The Privatization of Collective Consumption.” In Urban Life in Transition: Urban Affairs Annual Review. Eds. M. Gottdiener and C.P. Pickvance. Sage 39, 1991: 169-195. Fraser, N. “Clintonism, Welfare, and the Antisocial Wage: The Emergence of a Neoliberal Political Imaginary.” Rethinking Marxism. 6:1 (1993): 9-23. Freire, Paulo. The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers, Inc., 1985. Frobel, Folker, Jurgen Heinrichs, and Otto Kreye. The New International Division of Labor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. Frontera Norte. “Las Maquiladoras frente a la Integración.” Expansion. 552.22 (1989). Fullerton, Thomas, and Martha Patricia Barraza de Anda. “Maquiladora Prospects in Global Environment.” Texas Business Review. Austin: Bureau of Business Research, October 2003. Fussell, Elizabeth. “Making Labor Flexible: The Recomposition of Tijuana’s Maquiladora Female Labor Force.” Feminist Economics. 6.3 (2000): 59-79. Gamboa, Suzanne. “U.S. may cancel border plan: Proposal calls for fingerprints, photos of some.” Arizona Daily Star. March 5, 2004. Retrieved from . García, B. and de Oliveira, O. “Trabajo y Familia en la Investigación Sociodemografica de México”. In Eds. F. Alba and G.Cabrera. La Población en el Desarrollo Contemporáneo de México. México D.F.: COLMEX, CEDDU, 1994. Garcia, Jose Z. “Another Long Hot Summer in Arizona.” Frontera NorteSur. 2000.

381

García, Sonia R. and Maricela Márquez. “Motivational and Attitudinal Factors Amongst Latinas in U.S. Electoral Politics.” NWSA Journal. 13.2 (2001). García Montoya, Celina. “Los que no volvieron”. In Los Rostros de la Violencia. Ed. Teresa Fernández de Juan. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 2001. Garvin, Theresa. “‘We’re Strong Women’: Building a Community-University Research Partnership.” Geoforum. 26.3 (1995): 273-286. General Accounting Office (GAO). International Trade: México’s Maquiladora Decline Affects U.S.-México Border Communities and Trade; Recovery Depends in Part on México’s Actions. Washington, D.C., 2003: GAO-03891. Getty, Mark. “México’s Forgotten Disappeared: The Victims of the Border Narco Bloodbath.” Frontera NorteSur, 2004. Retrieved from . Gibson-Graham, J.K. “‘Stuffed if I know!’ Reflections on post-modernist social research.” Gender, Place and Culture. 1.2 (1994): 205-224. Giddens, Anthony. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. Routledge, New York, 2003. Gilbert, M.R. “Race, Space, and Power: The Survival Strategies of Working Poor Women.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 88.4 (1998): 595-621. Gilkes, C. T. “Building in Many Places: Multiple Commitments and Ideologies in Black Women’s Community Work.” In Women and the Politics of Empowerment. Eds. A. Bookman and S. Morgan. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.

382

Gilmore, R. W. “You Have Dislodged a Boulder: Mothers and Prisoners in the Post Keynesian California Landscape.” Transforming Anthropology. 8 (1999): 12-38. Gilot, Louis. “Paramedics often Called to Bridges.” El Paso Times, 17 May 2004. Giri, A. “The Dialectic between Globalization and Localization: Economic Restructuring, Women, and Strategies of Cultural Reproduction.” Man and Development. June 1995: 87-103. Glenn, E.N. “From Servitude to Service Work: Historical Continuities in the Racial Division of Paid Reproductive Labor.” Signs. 18.1 (1992): 1-43. Glick-Schiller, N., L. Basch, and C. Blanc-Szanton. “Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 645 (1992): 25-52. Godines, Valeria and Jennifer B. McKim. “Village’s Fortunes Tied to LeadTainted Pots Used for Candy.” Orange County Register, 3 May 2004. Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper, 1974. González, Cristina. Autonomja y Alianzas. El movimiento feminista en la ciudad de México, 1976-1986. México: Colección de Libros del PUEG/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2001. González, Deen J. Refusing the Favor: The Spanish American Women of Santa Fe. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Gonzaléz, Norma. I am My Language: Discourses of Women and Children on the Borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2001. González Casanova, Pablo. “Reestructuración de las ciencias sociales: hacia un nuevo paradigma.” In Briceño-León, Roberto, Pueblo, epoca y desarrollo. La sociología de América Latina. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, Centro de Estudios del Desarrollo, 1998.

383

González de la Rocha, M. The Resources of Poverty: Women and Survival in a Mexican City. Cambridge MA: Blackwell, 1994. González Montes, Soledad. Las Organizaciones No Gubernamentales Mexicanas y la salud reproductiva. México: El Colegio de México, 1999. Gordon, Linda. The Great Arizona Orphan Abduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999. Gramsci, Antonio. Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and translastor Derek Boothman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995. Grasmuck. S. and P. Pessar. Between Two Islands: Dominican International Migration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991. Gregson, N. and Lowe, M. Servicing the Middle Classes: Class, Gender, and Waged Work in Contemporary Britain. New York: Routledge, 1994. Guillén, T. “Servicios Públicos y Marginalidad Social en la Frontera Norte.” Frontera Norte 4.2 (July-December 1990). Tijuana: COLEF. Guillén Lopez, Tonatiuh. “Gobernabilidad y Gestión Local en México. El caso de Tijuana, B.C., 1989-1997.” In Transición Política y Democracia Municipal en México y Colombia. Eds. Martha Schteingart and E. Duhau. México: Ed. Porrúa. 2001. _______. “Municipio y Política Social: Experiencias y Nuevo Paradigma.” In Políticas Públicas Municipales. Una agenda en construcción. Ed. Enrique Cabrero. México: Premio Gobierno y Gestión Local, CIDE, Ed. Porrúa, 2003. Gustaitis, Rasa. “Double Fence Will Make It Twice as Hard to Preserve Unique Natural Area.” Pacific News Service, 22 February 2001. Retrieved from .

384

Gutiérrez Castañeda, Griselda. “El ejercicio de la ciudadanía de las mujeres y su contribución a la democracia.” Debate Feminista. 12.23 (2001): 125-137. _________, ed. Feminismo en México. Revisión histórico-crítica del siglo que termina. México: Colección de Libros del PUEG/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2002a. _________, ed. Democracia y Luchas de Género: La construcción de un nuevo campo teórico y político. México: Colección de Libros del PUEG/ Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2002b. Gutmann, Matthew. “Democracy and Social Control in Contemporary México.” 1999. Retrieved from . Hagan, J.M. “Social Networks, Gender, and Immigrant Incorporation: Resources and Constraints.” American Sociological Review. 63 (1998): 55-67. Hall, Kevin. “Jobs at Risk in México: Foreign Companies Looking Elsewhere for Cheaper Labor.” Hispanic Vista. Retrieved from . Hamilton, N. and Harding, T.F., eds. Modern Mexico, State, Economy, and Social Conflict. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1986. Hansen, Amelia. “Immigrant’s Body to Return Home.” Alameda Times-Star, 26 April 2004. Hansen, Ellen. “The Difference a Line Makes: Women’s Lives in Douglas, Arizona and Agua Prieta, Sonora.” In Life, Death, and In-Between on the US-México Border: Así es la Vida. Eds. Martha Oehmke Loustaunau and Mary Sánchez-Bane. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey, 1999: 77-94.

385

Hanson, S., Pratt, G., Mattingly, D. and Gilbert, M. “Women, Work, and Urban Environments.” In Women and the Environment. Eds. I. Altman and A. Churchman. New York: Plenum Press, 1994: 227-253. Hardin,B. The role of multi-sector collaborations in strengthening communities. Washington, D.C.: Union Institute, 1999. Hardy-Fanta, Carol. “Latina Women and Political Consciousness: La Chispa Que Prende.” In Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader. Eds. Cathy Cohen, Katheleen Jones and Joan Tronto. New York: New York Press, 1997. Harris, N. The New Untouchables: Immigration and the New World Worker. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers, 1995. Harrison, Bennet, and Barry Bluestone. The Great U-turn: Corporate Restructuring and the Polarization of America. New York: Basic Books, 1988. Hart, G. “Critical Ethnographies of Development in the Era of Globalization.” Progress in Human Geography. 28:1 (forthcoming 2004). Hartmann, Heidi et al. “Bringing Together Feminist Theory and Practice: A Collective Interview.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 21.4 (1996): 942-3. Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy and Yaiser, Michelle. L. Eds. Feminist Perspectives on Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Herzog, Lawrence A. Where North Meets South: Cities, Space, and Politics on the U.S.-Mexico Border. Austin: Center for Mexican American Studies, University of Texas, 1990. Heyman, Josiah McC. Life and Labor on the Border: Working People of Northeastern Sonora, Mexico, 1886-1986. Tucson, Ariz.: University of Arizona Press, 1991.

386

Hicks, Emily D. Border Writing: The Multidimensional Text. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. Hill, Rosalie. “Women and transport.” In Changing Places: Women’s Lives in the City. Eds. Chris Booth, Jane Darke, and Susan Yeandle London: Paul Chapman Publishing, 1996: 111-127. Himmelman, Arthur Turovh. ”On the theory and practice of transformational collaboration: from social service to social justice.” In Creating Collaborative Advantage. Ed. Huxham, Chris. London: Sage Publishers, 1996: 19-43. _______. “On Coalitions and the Transformation of Power relations: Collaborative Betterment and Collaborative Empowerment.” American Journal of Community Psychology. 29.2 (2001). Himmelweit, S. “Caring Labor.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 561 (1999): 27-38. Hing, B.O. “Don’t Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor: Conflicted Immigrant Stories and Welfare Reform.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review. 33.1 (1998): 159-182. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. Globalization in Question. Cambridge, 1996. Historia de Nogales, Sonora. Retrieved from . Hochschild, A. The Second Shift. New York: Viking, 1989.Howard, C. “Female Heads of Households in Ciudad Juárez.” S. Schmidt and D. Lorey. Policy Recommendations for Managing the El Paso-Juárez Metropolitan Area. El Paso Community Foundation, Center for Inter American and Border Studies, University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 1994. Retrieved from . .

387

Holloway, S.I. “Local Childcare Cultures: Moral Geographies of Mothering and the Social Organization of Pre-School Education.” Gender, Place, and Culture 5.1 (1998): 29-53. Homedes, Nuria and Antonio Ugalde. “Health reform and the decentralization of the Mexican states bordering Texas.” Unpublished paper presented on October 22, 2001 at the 129th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Atlanta, GA. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. “Working “Without Papers” in the United States: Toward the Integration of Legal Status in Frameworks of Race, Class, and Gender.” In Women and Work: Exploring Race, Ethnicity, and Class. Eds. E. Higginbotham and M. Romero. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1997: 101-125 ______. “Regulating the Unregulated? Domestic Workers’ Social Networks.” Social Problems. 41.1 (1994a): 50-64. ______. Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Migration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994b. House, John, W. Frontier on the Rio Grande: A Political Geography of Development and Social Deprivation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982. Huntington, Samuel. El choque de civilizaciones y la reconfiguración del orden mundial. México, Barcelona, Buenos Aires: Paidos, 1998. Hurtado, Albert L. Intimate Frontiers: Sex, Gender, and Culture in Old California. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1999. Hutton, Will and Anthony Giddens, Eds. Global Capitalism. New York: The New Press, 2002. Huxham, Chris, Ed. Creating Collaborative Advantage. London: Sage Publications, 1996.

388

Huxham, Chris and Siv Vangen. “Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration.” Human Relations. 53.6 (2000): 771-806. Hyatt, S. “From Citizen to Volunteer: Neoliberal Governance and the Erasure of Poverty.” In The New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics, and Impoverished People in the United States. Eds. J. Goode and J. Maskovsky. NYC: New York University Press, 2001. Ibarra, Ignacio. “Crossers to be Sent Back to Homes.” Arizona Daily Star, 21 February 2004. Iglesias Prieto, Norma. La flor mas bella de la maguiladora: historias de vida de la mujer obrera en Tijuana. BCN México, D.F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública: Centro de Estudios Fronterizos, 1985. Iglesias Prieto, Norma. The Beautiful Flowers of the Maquiladora: Life Histories of Women Workers in Tijuana. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997. Incháustegui, Teresa. “Participación política y políticas públicas: cómo hacer el vínculo en el caso de las mujeres?” In Participación política. Las Mujeres en México al final del milenio. Ed. Ana Fernández Poncela. México, D.F.: El Colegio de México, Programa Interdisciplinario de Estudios de la Mujer, 1995. INEGI, Estadistica de la industria maquiladora de exportacion 1990-2002. Aguascalientes, México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (INEGI). Jaquette, Jane S. The Women’s Movement in Latin America: Feminism and the Transition to Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991. Jelin, Elizabeth. Women and Social Change in Latin America. London and New Jersey: ZED, 1990.

389

Jelin, Elizabeth. “Ciudadanía emergente o exclusión? Movimientos sociales y ONG en los años noventa.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 54.4 (1994): 91-106. Joekes, Susan. “Trade-related Employment for Women in Industry and Services in Developing Countries.” Occasional paper no. 5. Geneva: UNRISD, 1995. Kabeer, N. Reversed Realities. Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso, 1994. Kanaiaupuni, Shawn Malia and Katherine M. Donato. “Migradollars and Mortality: The Effects of Migration on Infant Survival in México.” Demography. 36.3 (1999): 339-353. Kaplan, T. Crazy for Democracy: Women in Grassroots Movements. New York: Routledge, 1997. Kawachi, Ichiro and Bruce P. Kennedy. The Health of Nations: Why Inequality Is Harmful to Your Health. New York: The New Press, 2002. Kearney, M. “Borders and Boundaries of State and Self at the End of Empire.” Journal of Historical Sociology. 4.1 (1991): 52-74. Kearney, M. “The Local and the Global: The Anthropology of Globalization and Transnationalism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995). Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. Activists Beyond Borders. City: Cornell University Press, 1998. Keijzer, Benno de. “La masculinidad como factor de riesgo.” In Género y Violencia, Ed. Inés Martínez de Castro. Hermosillo, Sonora: El Colegio de Sonora, Secretaría de Salud Pública del Estado de Sonora, 1997. Kelly, L. Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988. Kiy, Richard and Naoko Kada. Blurred Borders: Transboundary Issues and Solutions in the San Diego/Tijuana Border Region. San Diego: International Community Foundation, 2004.

390

Kopinak, Kathryn. Desert Capitalism. Tucson: University of Arizona, 1996. Lamas, Marta. “Algunas características del movimiento feminista en Ciudad de México.” In Mujeres y Participación política. Avances y Desafíos en América Latina. Ed. Magdalena León. Colombia: Tercer Mundo Editores, 1994. Lamas, et.al. “Building Bridges: The Growth of Popular Feminism in México.” In The Challenge of Local Feminisms. Ed. Amrita Basu. Boulder: Westview Press, 1995. Lamphere, Louise. From working daughters to working mothers: Immigrant women in a New England community. Ithica: Cornell University Press, 1987. Landesman, Peter. “The Girls Next Door.” New York Times Magazine. 25 January 2004. Lattes, Alfredo. Ensayos sobre población y desarrollo. Acerca de los patrones recientes de movilidad territorial de la población del mundo. Corporación Centro Regional de Población and The Population Council, 1983. Law, R.M. and Wolch, J.R. “Social Reproduction in the City: Restructuring in Time and Space.” In The Restless Urban Landscape. Ed. Paul Knox. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993: 165-206. Levinsky, Steve, with the AVP Education Committee. AVP Basic Manual. (1985): A1-A2. Manuals available via . Lievesley, Geraldine. Democracy in Latin America: Mobilization, Power and the Search for a New Politics. City: Manchester University Press, 1999. Lim, Linda. “Women’s Work in Export Factories: The politics of a cause.” In Persistent Inequalities. Ed. Irene Tinker. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990: 101-19.

391

Lind, Amy Conger. “Power, Gender, and Development: Popular Women’s Organizations and the Politics of Needs in Ecuador.” The Making of Social Movements in Latin America. Eds. Arturo Escobar and Sonia E. Alvarez. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1992. Lobato, Mirta Jaida. “Women workers in the ‘Cathedrals of Corned Beef’: Structure and subjectivity in the Argentine meatpacking industry.” In The Gendered Worlds of Latin American Women Workers: From Household and Factory to the Union Hall and Ballot Box. Eds. John French and Daniel James. Durham: Duke University Press, 1997: 53-71. Long, N. An Introduction to the Sociology of Rural Development. London: Tavistock, 1977. López Estrada, Silvia. “Las Organizaciones No Gubemamentales Feministas en Baja California.” In Baja California: Escenarios del Nuevo Milenio. Ed. Tonatiuh Guillén. México: UNAM, 2002. _____. “Políticas de Participación Ciudadana: El Subcomité para Asuntos de la Mujer de Tijuana.” Unpublished paper. Lorey, D. E. The U.S-Mexican Border in the Twentieth Century. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1999.

392

Loven, Jennifer. “Bush vows to ease rigid border checks for certain Mexicans.” Arizona Daily Star. March 7. Retrieved from . Luibhéid, Eithne. Entry Denied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002. Maier, Elizabeth. Dilemas de los Feminismos Latinoamericanos. Cuaderno de Trabajo. Tijuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 1997. Malkin, V. “Reproduction of Gender Relations in the Mexican Migrant Community of New Rochelle, New York.” Paper presented at Coloquio de Antropología y Hostoría Regional. Michoacan, Mexico, 1-2 October 1997. Malveaux, J. “The Political Economy of Black Women.” In Race, Politics, and Economic Development: Community Perspectives. Ed. J. Jennings. London: Verso, 1992: 33-52. Manke, B., Seery, B., Crouter, A., and McHale, S. “The Three Corners of Domestic Labor: Mothers’, Fathers’, and Children’s Weekday and Weekend Housework.” Journal of Marriage and the Family. 56 (1994): 657-68. Marchand, Marianne H. “Engendering globalization in an era of transnational capital: new cross-border alliances and strategies of resistance in a post-NAFTA Mexico.” In Feminist Post-Development Thought: Rethinking Modernity, Postcolonialism, and Representation. Ed. Kriemild Saunders. New York: Zed Books, 2002: 105-119. Marks, Dorrit, Ed. Women and Grass Roots Democracy in the Americas. Miami, Florida: University of Miami, North-South Center, 1993. Martinez, Alicia and Teresa Inchástegui. In Feminist Policies in Contemporary Mexico: Strategies and Viability. Ed. Victoria E. Rodriguez. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998. Martinez, Manuel Luis. “Telling the difference between the border and the borderlands: materiality and theoretical practice.” In Globalization on

25

the Line: Culture, Capital, and Citizenship at U.S. Borders. Ed. Claudia Sadowski-Smith. New York: Palgrave, 2002. Martínez, Oscar J. “El Paso y Ciudad Juárez.” In Encuentro en la frontera: mexicanos y norteamericanos en un espacio común. Ed. Manuel Ceballos. Mexico: El Colegio de México, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte y Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, México, 2001. _____. “Border People and Their Cultural Roles: The Case of the U.S.-Mexican Borderlands.” In Borders and Border Regions in Europe and North America. Eds. Paul Ganster, Alan Seedler, James Scott, and Wolf DieterEberwein. San Diego: San Diego State University Press, 1997: 293-298. _____. Border People: Life and Society in the U.S-Mexico Borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1994. _____. Troublesome Border. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1988. Massey, D. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. Massolo, Alejandra. Mujeres y ciudades: Participación social, vivienda y vida cotidiana. México, D.F.: El Colegio de México Programa Interdisciplinario de Estudios de la Mujer, 1992. _____. Por amor y coraje: Mujeres en movimientos urbanos de la ciudad de México. México, D.F.: Colegio de México, 1992. _____. Los Medios y los Modos. Participación política y acción colectiva de las mujeres. México: El Colegio de México, 1994. _____. “Tienen que luchar alcaldesas para legitimarse en el poder.” Retreived from . Mattessich, Paul W., Marta Murray-Close, and Barbara R. Monsey with the Wilder Research Center. Collaboration: What Makes It Work, 2nd ed. St.Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, 2001.

26

Mattingly, Doreen J. “Job search, social networks, and local labor market dynamics: The case of paid household work in San Diego, California.” Urban Geography. 20.1 (1999a): 46-74. ______. “Making Maids: U.S. Immigration Policy and Immigrant Domestic Workers.” In Gender, Migration, and Domestic Service. Ed. J. Momson. New York: Routledge, 1999b: 62-80. ______. “Working Men and Dependent Wives: Gender, Race, and the Regulation of Migration from Mexico.” In Women Transforming Politics. Eds. K. Jones, J. Tronto, and C.Cohen. New York: New York University Press, 1997: 4761. Mayfield, Loomis and Edgar P. Lucas, Jr. “Mutual awareness, mutual respect: the community and the university interact.” Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research. 5.1 (2000): 173-184. McCaughan, E.J. “Mexico’s Long Crisis: Toward New Regimes of Accumulation and Domination.” Latin America Perspectives. 20.3 (1993): 6-31. McDonald, John. “Women Smuggled Across Border Forced into Prostitution, Police Say.” Orange County Register, 13 February 2004. McDowell, L. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. McElroy, Mathew. “The Emergence and Evolution of the Maquiladora Industry in México.” In Digame! Policy and Politics on the Texas Border. Eds. C. Brenner, I. Coronado and D. Soden. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishers, 2003. McKim, Jennifer B. and Keith Sharon. “Search for Answers: Fight for Laws Hampered by Budget Problems and Cultural Resistance.” Orange County Register, 30 April 2004. McTaggart, Robin, Ed. Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences. Albany: SUNY Press, 1997.

27

Miedema, Baukje. “Building a Research Team: The Struggle to Link the Community and the Academy.” Atlantis. 21.1 (1996): 89-93. Miller, Valerie. “Desafíos y Lecciones de la Incidencia Política: Interrogantes e Implicaciones para Programas de Acción, Capacitación y Apoyo Financiero.” Paper presented at the Regional Meeting on Advocacy, Training and Financial Support. Antigua, Guatemala, October 13th-14th, 2000. Minkler, Meredith. “Using Participatory Action Research to Build Healthy Communities.” Public Health Reports. 115 (2000): 191-198. Mitchell, D. Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2000. Mogrovejo, Norma. “Movimiento urbano y feminismo popular en la ciudad de México.” In Mujeres y Ciudades. Participación social, vivienda y vida cotidiana. Ed. Alejandra Massolo. México: El Colegio de México, 1992. Mohar, Gustavo and Alcaraz, María-Elena. “U.S. border controls: A Mexican perspective.” In The Wall Around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe. Eds. Peter Andreas and Timothy Snyder. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000: 139-152. Momson, J.H., ed. Gender, Migration, and Domestic Service. New York: Routledge, 1999. Monk, Janice, Patricia Manning, and Catalina Denman. “Working Together: Feminist Perspectives on Collaborative Research and Action.” ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographers. 2.1 (2003): 91-106. Moore, W. The Impact of Industry. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1965. Murdock, S.H., Md. N. Hoque, M. Michael, S. White, and B. Pecotte. The Texas Challenge: Population Change and the Future of Texas. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University Press, 1997.

28

Myers, Dowell and Cynthia J. Cranford. “Temporal Differentiation in the Occupational Mobility of Immigrant and Native-Born Latinas.” American Sociological Review. 63 (1998): 68-93. Naples, Nancy. “Changing the terms.” In Women’s Activism and Globalization: Linking Local Struggles and Transnational Politics. Eds. Nancy A. Naples and Manisha Desai. New York: Routledge, 2002. Naples, N. A. Ed. Community Activism and Feminist Politics: Organizing Across Race, Class, and Gender. New York: Routledge, 1998a. _______. Grassroots Warriors : Activist Mothering, Community Work, and the War on Poverty. New York: Routledge, 1998b. Nash, June. “The Impact of the Changing International Division of Labor on Different Sectors of the Labor Force.” In Women, Men, and the International Division of Labor. Eds. June Nash and Maria Patricia Fernandez-Kelly. Albany: SUNY Press, 1983: 3-38. Nathanson, Charles E. and Lampell, Julio. “Solving our border crossing problem in an era of terrorism.” Briefing paper prepared for San Diego Dialogue’s Forum Fronterizo series. San Diego: University of California, 2001. Retrieved from . National Latino Alliance for the Elimination of Domestic Violence. “Voices of Survivors.” First National Latina Policy Summit on Domestic Violence, 2001. Retrieved from . National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. “Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument Environmentally Assessment Update for Border Enforcement Activities.” May 2004. Retrieved from . National Public Radio (NPR). “Who’s Killing the Women of Juárez?” February 22, 2003. Retrieved from . Nevins, Joseph. Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the “Illegal Alien” and the Making of the U.S.-México Boundary. New York: Routledge, 2002.

29

_____. “The remaking of the California-Mexico boundary in the age of NAFTA.” In The Wall Around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe. Eds. Peter Andreas and Timothy Snyder. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000: 99-114. Norrell, Brenda. “Ranchers Form Vigilante Posses Along the Border.” Indian Country, 10 May 2000. Nunley, M. Christopher. “Kickapoo Indians.” The Handbook of Texas Online, 2002. Retrieved from “Officials to Discuss Ways of Stopping Trafficking.” Pasadena Star-News. April 25, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/cda. Ojeda, Norma. “Algunas contradicciones en el perfil sociodemográfico de las mujeres en la frontera norte de México.” Cuadernos de Trabajo. México: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, No. DTS-2, 1997. _____. “What do California Latinas and Mexicanas in Baja California Think About Family Planning and Abortion?” The Two Californias Binacional Survey Findings. San Diego: SDSU, COLEF and Planned Parenthood, March 2004 (mimeograph). _____. ¿Qué piensan las mujeres en Baja California acerca de la planificación familiar y el aborto? Hallazgos de una encuesta. México: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 2003. _____. “Familias Transfronterizas en Tijuana: migración y trabajo internacional” In Familias Transfronterizas en Tijuana-San Diego: dos estudios complementarios. Eds. Norma Ojeda and Silvia López. México: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 1994: 11-42. Oliveira, Orlandina and Marina Ariza. “Un recorrido por los estudios de género en México: Consideraciones sobre áreas prioritarias.” Paper presented in the Workshop Gender and Development. Montevideo, Uruguay, September 6-7, 1999. CIID/IDRC.

30

Ono, Kent A. and John M. Sloop. Shifting Borders: Rhetoric, Immigration and California’s Proposition 187 (Mapping Racisms). Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2002. Orenstein, P. Schoolgirls: Young Women, Self-esteem, and the Confidence Gap. New York: Doubleday, 1994. Oropesa, R.S. “Using the Service Economy to Relieve the Double Burden: Female Labor Force Participation and Service Purchases.” Journal of Family Issues. 14.3 (1993): 438-473. Orrenius, Pia M. Illegal Immigration and Enforcement Along the U.S.-México Border: An Overview. Dallas: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 2001. Ortíz-González, Victor. El Paso: Local Frontiers at a Global Crossroads. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004. Palmer, P. Domesticity and Dirt: Housewives and Domestic Servants in the United States: 1920-1945. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989. Pardo, Mary. “Mexican American women grassroots community activists: ‘Mothers of East Los Angeles.’” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies. 11.1 (1990): 1-7. Pardo, M. Mexican-American Women Activists: Identity and Resistance in Two Los Angeles Communities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1998. Pavlakovic, Vera K. and Kim, Hak-Hoon. “Outshopping by maquila employees: Implications for Arizona’s border communities.” Arizona Review. 38.1 (1990): 9-16. Peake, L.J. “Toward an Understanding of the Interconnectedness of Women’s Lives: The “Racial” Reproduction of Labor in Low-Income Urban Areas.” Urban Geography. 16.5 (1995): 414-439. Peck, J., Tickell, A. Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode. 34.2(2002): 380-404. Peña, Devon G. “Tortuosidad: Shop Floor Struggles of Female Maquiladora Workers.” Women on the Us-México Border: Responses to Change. Eds. V. Ruiz and S. Tiano. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987: 129-154.

31

_____. The Terror of the Machine: Technology, Work, Gender, and Ecology at the U.S. Mexico Border. Austin: Center for Mexican American Studies, University of Texas, 1997. Pessar, Patricia R. and Sarah J. Mahler. “Transnational migration: bringing gender in.” International Migration Review. 37.3 (2003): 812-829. Pettman, Jan Jindy. “Globalization and the gendered politics of citizenship.” In Women, Citizenship and Difference. Eds. Nira Yuval-Davis and Pnina Werbner. London: Zed Books, 1999: 207-20. Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. Globalization Unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st Century. London: Zed Books, 2001. Picchio, A. Social Reproduction: The Political Economy of the Labour Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Pick, James B., J. Henttrick, N. Viswanathan, and E. Ellsworth. “Binationality in the US.-Mexican Border Twin Cities.” Executive Summary Final Report to the Ford Foundation. (mimeograph) Redlands, Calif., University of Redlands, n.d. Platt, Kamala and Coronado, Irasema. “The Cultural Poetics of Environmental Justice.” Guadalupe Cultural Arts Center, San Antonio, Texas, forthcoming 2004. Poniatowska, Elena. “Las Mil y Una.” In Heridas de Paulina. México, Plaza Janés, 2000. Pradilla, E. and Castro, C. “Las Fronteras de la Maquila.” México: Frontera Norte, Territorios, 1994. Pratt, G. “From Registered Nurse to Registered Nanny: Discursive Geographies of Filipina Domestic Workers in Vancouver, B.C.” Economic Geography. 75.3 (1999): 215-236. ______. “Stereotypes and Ambivalence: The Construction of Domestic Workers in Vancouver, B.C.” Gender, Place, and Culture. 4.2 (1997): 159-177.

32

Prugl, Elisabeth and Meyer Mary K., Eds. Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1999. Quintero, C. “Condiciones Laborales y Sindicales en las Maquiladoras y sus Implicaciones para la Familia.” In Colonias and Public Policy in Texas and México: Urbanization by Stealth, Ed. P. Ward. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999. Radin, Margaret J. Contested Commodities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996. Ramírez, L. “La Crisis Económica y las Respuestas de las Mujeres a través de las Organizaciones de Sobrevivencia.” In Perez. M.P. and Casaüs, M.E. La Mujer Latinoamericana Ante el Reto del Siglo XXI, IX Jornadas de Investigación Interdisciplinaria sobre la Mujer, Instituto Universitario de Estudios de la Mujer, Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid. Razavi, Shahra. “Export-oriented employment, poverty, and gender: Contested accounts.” In Gendered Poverty and Well-Being. Ed. Shahra Razavi. Maiden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 2000, 239-268. Reding, A. and Whalen, C. Fragile Stability: Reform and Repression in Mexico under Carlos Salinas, 1981-1991. New York: World Policy Institute, 1991. Reinharz, Shulamit. Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Rey, Joel R., Polzin, Steven E., and Bricka, Stacey G. “An assessment of the potential saturation in men’s travel.” In Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, 1990 NPTS Report Series, Demographic Special Reports. Washington D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, 1995: 1-1 – 1-63. Richardson, Valerie. “State Ballot Measures on Illegals Founder.” The Washington Times, 17 May 2004.

33

Rico, Gabriela. “Border Patrol busts Tucson Human-Smuggling Ring.” Tucson Citizen, 4 December 2003. Rodriguez, Victoria E. Decentralization in Mexico: from Reforma Municipal to Solidaridad to Nuevo Federalismo. Boulder: Westview Press, 1997. Rodriquez, Olga R. “Illegal Immigration from México on Rise.” The Oregonian, 28 April 2004. Rodriguez, Victoria, Ed. Women’s Participation in Mexican Political Life. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1998. Rodriguez, Victoria. Women in Contemporary Mexican Politics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2003. Rollins, J. Between Women: Domestics and Their Employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1985. Romero, M. Maid in the U.S.A. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, 1992. Roschelle, A.R. No More Kin: Exploring Race, Class and Gender in Family Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997. Rose, D. “Local Child Care Strategies in Montreal, Quebec: The Mediations of State Policies, Class, and Ethnicity in the Life Course of Families with Young Children.” In Full Circles: Geographies of Women over the Life Course. Eds. C. Katz and J. Monk. New York: Routledge, 1993: 188207. Rosenbloom, Sandra. Women’s travel patterns at various stages of their lives. In Full Circles: Geographies of Women over the Life Course. Eds. Cindi Katz and Janice Monk. New York: Routledge, 1993: 208-42 ______. “Travel by women.” In Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, 1990 NPTS Report Series, Demographic Special Reports. Washington D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation, 1995: 2-1 – 2-57. Rudolph, Lloyd I. and Susanne Hoeber Randolph. “Engaging Subjective Knowledge: How Amar Singh’s Diary Narratives of and by the Self Explain

34

Identity Formation.” Perspectives on Politics. 1.4 (December 2003): 681-694. Ruiz, Olivia. “Visiting the mother country: Border-crossing as a cultural practice.” In The U.S.-Mexico Border: Transcending Divisions, Contesting Identities. Eds. David Spener and Kathleen Staudt. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998: 105-120. Ruiz, Vicki, L. “By Day or Weekend: Mexican Domestic Workers in El Paso.” In To Toil the Livelong Day: America´s Women at Work, 1780-1980. Eds. Carol Groneman and Mary Beth Norton. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press, 1987. Ruiz, Vicki L. and Tiano, Susan, Eds. Women on the U.S.-México Border: Responses to Change. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987. Ruiz Garcia, Aída. “Migración oaxaqueña, una aproximación a la realidad.” Oaxaca, México: Coordinación Estatal de Atención al Migrante Oaxaqueño, 2002. Sadowski-Smith, Claudia. Ed. Globalization on the Line: Culture, Capital, and Citizenship at U.S. Borders. New York: Palgrave, 2002. Safa, Helen. The Myth of the Male Breadwinner: Women and Industrialization in the Caribbean. Boulder: Westview, 1995. _____. “Gender Implications of Export-Led Industrialization in the Caribbean Basin.” In Engendering Wealth and Well-Being. Ed. Blumberg, R.L. Boulder: Westview Press, 1995. Saffioti, Heleieth I.B. “Female Labor and Capitalism in the United States and Brazil.” In Women Cross-Culturally: Change and Challenge. Ed. Ruby Rohrilich-Leavitt. Mouton: The Hague, 1975: 59-94. Saint-Germain, Michelle A. “Re-Presenting the Public Interest on the U.S.Mexico Border.” In The U.S.-Mexico Border: Transcending Divisions,

35

Contesting Identities. Eds. David Spener and Kathleen Staudt. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Reinner Publishers, 1998: 59-81. Salant, Tanis J., Christine Thurlow Brenner, Nadia Rubaii-Barrett and John R. Weeks. Illegal Immigrants in U.S./México Border Counties: the Costs of Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice and Emergency Medical Services. Tucson: Institute for Local Government, The University of Arizona, 2001. Salas-Porras, A. “Maquiladoras y Burguesías Regionales.” In Maquiladoras, Primera Reunión Nacional Sobre Asuntos Fronterizos. Ed. A. García. Monterrey: Anuies, 1989. Saldívar, José David. Border Matters: Remapping American Cultural Studies. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1997. Salinas, Daniel. “More Than One Quarter of BC Women are Victims of Family Violence.” Mexicali: La Croni, May 7, 2004. Salvídar-Hull, Sonia. Feminism on the Border: Chicana Gender Politics and Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000. Salzinger, Leslie. Genders in production: making workers in Mexico's global factories. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. ______. “From High Heels to Swathed Bodies: Gendered Meanings Under Production in México’s Export-Processing Industry.” Feminist Studies. 23.3 (1997): 549-75. Sánchez Olvera, Alma Rosa. El Feminismo Mexicano ante el Movimiento Urbano Popular: dos expresiones de lucha de género, 1970-1985. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Acatlán: Plaza y Valdés, 2002. San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce. n.d. “Border Crossing.” Retrieved from . Sassen, Saskia. Globalization and its Discontents. New York: The New York Press, 1998.

36

Saucedo González, Irma. Apuntes para la Elaboración de una Propuesta de Participación Política Feminista. In Participación Política. Las Mujeres en México al Final del Milenio. Ed. Anna M. Fernández Poncela. 2002. Schecter, T. Race, Class, Women and the State: The Case of Domestic Labor. Montreal: Black Rise Books, 1998. Schmink, Marianne. “Women and Industrial Development in Brazil.” In Women and Change in Latin America. Eds. June Nash and Helen Safa. South Hadley, Massachusetts: Bergin and Garvey, 1986: 136-64. Schnailberg, L. “Judge Rejects Prop. 187 Bans on Calif. Services.” Education Week, 29 November 1995. Schofield, Josie. “The Theory and Practice of Community-Based Feminist Activism.” Atlantis. 21.1 (1996): 105-108. Selby, H.A., A.D. Murphy, and S.A. Lorenzen. The Mexican Urban Household. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1990. Serret, Estela. “El feminismo mexicano de cara al siglo XXI.” El Cotidiano. 16.100, marzo-abril, 2000. _______. “The Role of Women’s Non-Governmental Organizations in Mexican Public Life.” In Women’s Participation in Mexican Political Life. Ed. Victoria E. Rodríguez. 1998. _______. “De la Identidad al Espacio Público: Las Organizaciones no Gubernamentales de Mujeres en México.” In Organizaciones Civiles y Públicas en México y Centroamérica. Ed. José Luis Méndez. México: Porrúa Editores, 1998. Shirk, David and Alexander Webber. “Slavery without Borders: Human Trafficking in the U.S.-México Context.” Hemisphere Focus. XII.5 (2004). Sifuentes, Edward. “North Country a Hot Spot in Migrant Sex Trade.” North County Times, 28 April, 2004a.

37

_______. “Report: Latino Immigrants Send $30 Billion to Home Countries.” North County Times, 21 May, 2004b. Sklair, Leslie. Assembling for Development: The Maquila Industry in México and The United States. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, 1993. Slattery, Ryan. “Protecting the Parks Along the Border.” The Washington Post, 26 April 2004. Smith, Claudia. “Migrantes en peligro mortal. Lo único que ha cambiado es la cantidad de muertos.” In Los Rostros de la Violencia. Ed. Teresa Fernández de Juan. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 2001. Social Science Research Council (SSRC). International Scholarly Collaboration: Lessons from the Past. A Report of the Social Science Research Council Inter-Regional Group on International Scholarly Collaboration, Vol. 3. New York: Social Science Research Council, 2000. Social Science Research Laboratory. “Survey of California Latina Attitudes Regarding Family Planning Issues.” Research Report to Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California Incorporated.(mimeograph) San Diego: The Social Science Research Laboratory of San Diego State University, 2001. Solórzano-Torres, Rosalía. “Female Mexican Immigrants in San Diego County.” In Women on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Responses to Change. Eds. Vicki L. Ruiz and Susan Tiano. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1987: 41-59. Spain, D. and Bianchi, S.M. Balancing Act: Motherhood, Marriage, and Employment among American Women. New York: Sage, 1996. Speed, Shannon. “Actions Speak Louder than Words Indigenous Women and Gendered Resistance in the Wake of Acteal." In Women of Chiapas Making History in Times of Struggle and Hope. Eds. Christine Eber and Christine Kovic. Routledge, 2003.

38

Spener, David. “The logic and contradictions of intensified border enforcement in Texas.” In The Wall Around the West: State Borders and Immigration Controls in North America and Europe. Eds. Peter Andreas and Timothy Snyder. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000: 115-138. _______. “Controlling the Border in El Paso del Norte: Operation Blockade or Operation Charade?” In Border Ethnographies: The Limits of Border Theory. Ed. Pablo Vila. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2003: X-X. Standing, Guy. “Global Feminization Through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited.” World Development. 27.3 (1999): 583-602. _______. “Global Feminization Through Flexible Labor.” World Development. 17.7 (1989): 1077-95. Stanko, E. Intimate Intrusions: Women’s Experience of Male Violence. London: Routledge, 1985. Staudt, Kathleen A. Free trade?: Informal economies at the US-México border. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1998. _______. Policy, Politics and Gender: Women Gaining Ground. West Hartford, Connecticut: Kumarian Press, 1998. _______. “Economic Change and Ideological Lag in Households of Maquila Workers in Ciudad Juárez.” In The Social Ecology and Economic Development of Ciudad Juárez. Ed. G. Young. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1983: 97-120. Staudt, Kathleen A. and Coronado, Irasema. “Civic Action for Accountability: Anti-Violence Organizing in Ciudad Juárez- El Paso.” Center for U.S.Mexican Studies Project on Reforming the Administration of Justice in México. May 15, 2003. Retrieved from .

39

_______. Fronteras No Mas: Toward Social Justice at the US-México Border. New York: Palgrave, 2002. Stevens, Sally and Harry K. Wexler. Women and Substance Abuse: Gender Transparency. New York: Haworth Press, 1998. Stiell, B. and England, K. “Domestic Distinctions: Constructing Difference among Paid Domestic Workers in Toronto.” Gender, Place, and Culture. 4.3 (1997): 339-359. Stølen, K.A. and M. Vaa. Gender and Change in Developing Countries. London: Norwegian University Press, 1991. Swiss Commission for Research Partnership with Developing Countries (KFPE). Enhancing Research Capacity in Developing and Transition Countries. Bern: KPFE Secretariat, 2001. ______. Guidelines for Research in Partnership with Developing Countries,2nd ed. Bern: KFPE Secretariat, 1998. Takash, Paule Cruz. “Breaking Barriers to Representation Chicana/Latina Elected Officials in California.” Urban Anthropology 22 (1993): 325360. Reprinted in Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader. Eds. Cathy Cohen, Katheleen Jones and Joan Tronto. New York: New York Press, 1997. Tiano, Susan. “Women and Industrial Development in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 21(1986): 157-70. _____. “Gender, Work, and World Capitalism: Third World Women’s Role in Development.” In Analyzing Gender: A Handbook for Social Science Research. Eds. Beth Hess and Myra Marx Ferree. Newbury Park, California: Sage Press, 1987a: 216-43. _____. “Maquiladoras in Mexicali: Integration or Exploitation?” In Women on the U.S.-México Border: Responses to Change. Eds. Vicki Ruiz and Susan Tiano. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987b: 77-102.

40

______. “Women workers in the electronics and garment industries: Who Assembles in Mexicali Maquilas?” Review of Latin American Studies. 3.1 (1990): 63-82. ______. Patriarchy on the Line: Labor, Gender, and Ideology in the Mexican Maquila Industry. Philadelphia: Temple, 1994. ______. “The role of women.” In Understanding Contemporary Latin America. Ed. Richard Hillman. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1997: 237-70. Tiano, Susan and Carolina Ladino. “Dating, Mating, and Motherhood: Identity Construction Among Mexican Maquila Workers.” Environment and Planning. A.31 (1999): 305-325. Tiano, Susan and Vicki L. Ruiz, eds. Women on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Responses to Change. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1998. Tones, M. Espacios Familiares: Ámbitos de Sobrevivencia y Solidaridad. México D.F.: PUEG, CONAPO, DIF, UNAM and UAM, 1997. Torres, Pedro. “Premiarán a Esther Chavez.” El Diario de Juárez. May 19, 2003. Touraine, Alan. “¿Podriamos vivir juntos?” Fondo de Cultura Económica. México D.F., 1997. Townsend, Janet Gabriel, in collaboration with Ursula Arrevillaga, Jennie Bain, Socorro Cancino, Susan F. Frenk, Silvana Pacheco and Elia Pérez. Women’s Voices from the Rainforest. London: Routledge, 1995. Tribe, Laurence H. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1990. Truong, T.D. “Gender, International Migration and Social Reproduction: Implications for Theory, Policy, Research, and Networking.” Asian and Pacific Migration Theory. 5.1 (1996): 27-52.

41

Tucker, S. Telling Memories among Southern Women: Domestic Workers and Their Employers in the Segregated South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988. Tuñon, Esperanza. “Women’s Struggles for Empowerment in México.” In Women Transforming Politics: Worldwide Strategies for Empowerment. Ed. Jill M. Bysttdzienski. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992. Turf, Luke. “SENTRI may speed car crossings at the border.” Tucson Citizen. May 6, 2004. Retrieved from . Tyner, J.A. “The Gendering of Philippine International Migration.” Professional Geographer. 48.8 (1996): 405-16. United Nations. The World’s Women, 1970-1990. New York: United Nations, 1991. ______. The World’s Women 2000: Trends and Statistics. Social Statistics and Indicators, Series K, No. 16. New York: United Nations, 2000. ______. The Migration of Women: Methodological Issues in the Measurement and Analysis of Internal and International Migration. Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic: International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women, 1994. USA Today. “Some Illegal Migrants Get Free Pass.” 2 February 2004. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Boulder Canyon Project, All American Canal System. Retrieved from . U.S. Department of Justice. “Justice Department Announces Sentencing in South Texas Human Trafficking and Sex Slavery Prosecution.” Jan. 29, 2004. Retrieved from . U.S. Department of State. Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons. Retrieved from . U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency. Inside ICE. 1.3 (2004): 4.

42

United States-Mexico Border Health Commission (USMBHC). Healthy Border 2010: An Agenda for Improving Health on the United States-Mexico Border. El Paso: USMBHC Central Office, October 2003. Valdez, Diana Washington. “Hopeful Young Women Perish in City of Broken Dreams.” El Paso Times, 27 April 2004. Varley, Ann and Maribel Blasco. “Gender and Property in México’s Colonias Populares.” Paper presented at the XXX International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. Miami, FL., 2000. Vaughan, Mary. “Women, class, and education in México, 1880-1928.” In Women in Latin America. Ed. Eleanor Leacock Burke. Riverside, Calif.: Latin American Perspectives, 1979: 63-80. Veccia, Theresa. “‘My Duty as a Woman’: Gender Ideology, Work, and WorkingClass Women’s Lives in Sao Paulo, Brazil, 1900-1950.” In The Gendered Worlds of Latin American Women Workers: From Household and Factory to the Union Hall and Ballot Box. Eds. John French and Daniel James Durham. Duke University Press, 1997: 100-46. Velasco, Laura. “El Regreso de la Comunidad: Migración Indígena y Agentes Étnicos.” Los Mixtecos En La Frontera México-Estados Unidos. México: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Sociológicos, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 2002. Velez-Ibañez, Carlos G. Rituals Of Marginality: Politics, Process And Culture Change In Urban Central México 1969-1974. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983. Verea Campos, Mónica “Los inmigrantes ante la creciente militarización en la frontera México-Estados Unidos”. In Los límites sociopolíticos y fronteras culturales en América del Norte. Eds. Barbara Driscoll, Claire Joysmith, Elaine Levine, Antonio Rivera and Monica Verea. México: UNAM-CISAN, 2000.

43

Vernez, Georges. “Mexican labor in California’s economy: From rapid growth to likely stability.” In The California-Mexico Connection. Eds. Abraham F. Lowenthal and Katrina Burgess. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1993: 147-63 Vila, Pablo. Ethnography at the Border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 2003. _______. Crossing Borders, Reinforcing Borders: Social Categories, Metaphors, and Narrative Identities on the U.S.-Mexico Frontier. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2000. Ward, Justin. “Women Perform Activist Role in Border Towns.” The Daily Texan, 5 February 2004. Ward, Kathryn B. and Jean L. Pyle. “Gender, industrialization, transnational corporations, and development. An overview of trends and patterns.” In Women and the Latin American Development Process. Eds. Christine E. Bose and Edna Acosta-Belén. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1995. Ward, P. Colonias and Public Policy in Texas and México: Urbanization by Stealth. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999. Warner, Judith. “Time allocation.” In Gender and Agricultural Development: Surveying the Field. Ed. Helen Henderson with Ellen Hansen. Tucson, Ariz.: University of Arizona Press, 1995: 12-17. Waterman, Shaun. “Biometric borders coming.” The Washington Times, October 28, 2003. Retrieved from . Weedon, C. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987. Weinstein, Barbara. “Unskilled Worker, Skilled Housewife: Constructing the Working-Class Woman in Sao Paulo, Brazil.” In The Gendered Worlds of Latin American Women Workers: From Household and Factory to the Union

44

Hall and Ballot Box. Eds. John French and Daniel James. Durham: Duke University Press, 1997: 72-99. Weisskopf, Thomas. “Imperialism and the Economic Development of the Third World.” In The Capitalist System. Eds. Richard Edwards, Michael Reich, and Thomas Weisskopf. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1978: 499-515. Wiewel, Wim and Michael Lieber. “Goal achievement, relationship building, and incrementalism: the challenges of university-community partnerships.” Journal of Planning Education and Research. 17 (1998): 291-301. Wheeler, C. “The New Alien Restrictions on Public Benefits: The Full Impact Remains Uncertain.” Interpreter Releases. 36 (1996): 1245. Wilson, Patricia. Exports and Local Development: Mexico’s New Maquiladoras. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992. Wolch, J. “The Shadow State: Transformations in the Voluntary Sector.” In The Power of Geography. Eds. J. Wolch and M. Dear. Boston: Hyman, 1989. Wolf, D.L. Factory Daughters: Gender, Household Dynamics and Rural Industrialization in Java. Oxford: University of California Press, 1992. Wolff, Thomas J, Ed. “Introduction: Community Coalition Building: Contemporary Practice and Research.” American Journal of Community Psychology. 29.2 (2001). Woo Morales, Ofelia. Las mujeres también nos vamos al norte. Guadalajara: University of Guadalajara, 2001. ______. “Migración femenina indocumentada.” Frontera Norte 9.17 (1997): 11329. ______. “Las mujeres mexicanas indocumentadas en la migración internacional y la movilidad transfronteriza.” In Mujeres, migración y maquila en la frontera norte. México: El Colegio de México y El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 1995.

45

Woodrow, K. A. and Passel, J. S. “Post-IRCA Undocumented Immigration to the United States: An Assessment Based on the June 1988 CPS.” In Undocumented Migration to the United States: IRCA and the Experience of the 1980s. Eds. F.D. Bean, B. Edmonston, and J.S. Passel. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute Press, 1990: 33-76 Woog, Mario. El Programa Mexicano de Maquiladoras. Guadalajara: Instituto de Estudios Sociales, Universidad de Guadalajara Press, 1980. Wright, Joanne. “Deconstructing development theory: Feminism, the public/private dichotomy, and the Mexican maquiladoras.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 34.1 (1997). Wright, Melissa. “Feminine villains, masculine heroes, and the reproduction of Ciudad Juárez.” Social Text 69. 19.4 (2001): 93-113. ______. “Crossing the factory frontier: Gender, place, and power in a Mexican maquiladora.” Antipode. 29.3 (1997): 278-302. Yeoh, B.S.A. and Huang, S. “Singapore Women and Foreign Domestic Workers: Negotiating Domestic Work and Motherhood.” In Gender, Migration, and Domestic Service. Ed. J. Momson. New York: Routledge, 1999: 277-300. Young, G. “Gender Identification and Working-Class Solidarity Among Maquila Workers in Ciudad Juárez: Stereotypes and Realities.” In Women on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Responses to Change. Eds. V. Ruiz and S. Tiano. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1987. Young, Gay. “Gender Inequality and Industrial Development: The Household Connection.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 24.1 (1993): 1-21. Young, G. and Vera, B. “Women, Work and Households in Ciudad Juárez.” Report to the Asociación de Maquiladoras, A.C. (AMAC). Ciudad Juárez, México: Maquiladora Association, 1994.

46

Source: United States General Accounting Office. U.S. Mexico Border: Despite Some Progress Environmental Infrastructure Challenges Remain. March 2000.

Percentage ofHouseholds Below Poverty

Figure 2 Percentage of Households Living Below the Poverty Level in U.S. border Cities and State, 1999

60 50 40 30 20 10 0

TX TX TX XAS AZ ONA CA CA NIA NM ICO TX TX TX TX Z co go OR us EX le io ss so do en io TE I R xi i e IF m b e ll i d R Pa P a M il r A Y N a g l W L g u u v D La McA res le CA Col NE wns De gle El No Do P Ca Sa n a o E Br U.S. Cities and States Source: U.S. Bureau of Census, Summary File 3 AZ

s la

o ac

AZ

s le

AZ

a um

47

Table 1 Adjacent States in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region, 2000

U.S. State California Arizona New Mexico Texas

U.S. Population 33,871,648 5,130,632 1,819,046 20,851,820

Mexican State Mexican Population Baja California 2,487,367 Sonora 2,216,969 Chihuahua 3,052,907 Chihuahua 3,052,907 Coahuila de Zaragosa 2,298,070 Nuevo León 3,834,141 Tamaulípas 2,753,222 Source: U.S. Bureau of Census and Instituto Nacional de Estadística GeografÍa e Informática

Table 2 Sister Cities in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region, 2000

U.S. City San Diego Calexico Yuma Nogales Naco Douglas Columbus El Paso Presidio Del Rio Eagle Pass Laredo McAllen Brownsville Border Total

U.S. Population 1,223,400 27,109 77,515 20,878 833 14,312 1,765 563,662 4,167 33,867 22,413 176,576 106,414 139,722 2,412,633

U.S. Population as Percent of Municipal Region 50.3 3.4 34.8 11.6 13.4 18.8 n/a 31.6 14.6 23.5 14.9 36.2 20.2 25.0 32.6

Mexican City Tijuana Mexicalli San Luis Río Colorado Nogales Naco Agua Prieta Las Palomas Cuidad Juárez Ojinaga Cuidad Acuña Piedras Negras Nuevo Laredo Reynosa Matamoras Border Total

Mexican Population 1,210,820 764,602 145,006 159,787 5,370 61,944 n/a 1,218,817 24,307 110,487 128,130 310,915 420,463 418,141 4,978,789

Mexican Population as Percent of Municipal Region 49.7 96.6 65.2 88.4 86.6 81.2 n/a 68.4 85.4 76.5 85.1 63.8 79.8 75.0 67.4

Source: U.S. Bureau of Census and Instituto Nacional de Estadística GeografÍa e Informática

48